Search for: "In re Children"
Results 1 - 20
of 33,193
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2012, 6:12 am
The case of Re W (Children) [2012] EWCA Civ 999, decided today, involved a father's successful appeal against the dismissal of his application for direct contact with his daughters. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 6:27 am
Re S (Children) [2011] EWCA Civ 454 concerned the unusual circumstance of a father obtaining leave to remove two children from the jurisdiction, but the mother only appealing in respect of the younger child.Facts: The father is Canadian and the mother English by birth. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 2:51 am
In re J (Children) (Care Proceedings: Standard of Proof) [2012] EWCA Civ 380; [2012] WLR (D) 111 In looking to the threshold criteria identified within section 31 of the Children Act 1989, and addressing the problem of the unidentified perpetrator of violence to a child or children where the pool of perpetrators was limited, the courts had to apply, with great care, the authorities in the Court of Appeal and Supreme Court, where it was mooted that such authority… [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 2:53 am
In re A (Children) (Abduction: Interim Powers) [2010] EWCA Civ 586; [2010] WLR (D) 139 “S 5 of the Child Abduction and Custody Act 1985 permitted a court to give directions to a local authority to provide accommodation for the abductor and abducted children. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 2:45 am
The case of Re L-W (Children) EWCA Civ 1253, decided last week, perhaps demonstrated the limits of the courts powers when dealing with an intractable contact dispute.The facts: The father and the mother have two children: M, a boy, born in 1999, and E, a girl, born in 2001. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 1:35 am
In re P-J (Children) (Abduction: Consent) Court of Appeal “Consent to the removal of a child from one jurisdiction to another had to be real and subsist at the time of the removal. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 5:13 am
” The post Rayden Solicitors in Court of Appeal on important International issue re children appeared first on Rayden Solicitors. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 1:53 am
In re D (Children) (Care proceedings: Preliminary hearing) Court of Appeal “Where it was clear that a child had been assaulted by one or other of two people, the court was not required to identify which one was the perpetrator. [read post]
30 Jul 2007, 1:44 am
In re W (Children) (Permission to appeal) “The function of the Court of Appeal on a permission application for residence and contact was limited to a review of the decision of the judge to see whether a prospective appellant had an arguable case, fit to present to the full court on appeal, that the order was ‘plainly wrong’. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 9:04 am
From First Focus: Dear Colleagues, We are writing to urge you to support the Humane Enforcement and Legal Protections (HELP) for Separated Children Act or the “HELP Separated Children Act,” which will be re-introduced soon by Senator Al Franken, by... [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 2:00 am
In re A (Children) (Judgment: Adequacy of Trial Judge’s Reasoning) [2011] EWCA Civ 1205; [2011] WLR (D) 346 “The Court of Appeal gave guidance as to the practice to be adopted where there was concern about the adequacy of a trial judge’s reasoning, when adjourning, part heard, an appeal by the mother of two children, A and L, against the decision of Judge Compston, sitting as a judge of the Family Division on 27 May 2011, as to the adequacy of his… [read post]
6 Aug 2007, 2:28 am
Telling child its true paternity In re F (Children) (Declaration of paternity) “The family justice system was entitled to take responsibility for deciding whether a child should be told of his paternity, in the event of adult dispute. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 2:40 am
In re P-J (Children) (Abduction: Consent) [2009] EWCA Civ 588; [2009] WLR (D) 207 “Effective ‘consent’ to the removal of a child from the jurisdiction of the state of its habitual residence could in principle be given in advance by an eligible person. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 2:24 am
In re W (Children) (Family proceedings: Evidence) Supreme Court “A presumption that a child should not be called to give evidence in family proceedings could not be reconciled with the rights of all concerned in those proceedings under articles 6 and 8 of the European Convention on Human Right and accordingly would no longer be regarded as appropriate. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 1:52 am
In re T (Children) (Care Proceedings: Costs) [2012] UKSC 36; [2012] WLR (D) 223 “A local authority should not be liable in care proceedings for the costs of interveners against whom allegations had been reasonably made but which had been held by the court to be unfounded. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 2:34 am
In re S-B (Children) (Care Proceedings: Standard of Proof) [2009] UKSC 17; [2009] WLR (D) 365 "The test to be applied to the identification of a potential perpetrator, out of a pool of two or more potential perpetrators, who might have caused harm to a child was the balance of probabilities and that standard of proof [...] [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 3:24 am
Family jurisdiction role of the Court of Appeal explained In re W (Children) (Permission to appeal) Court of Appeal “The function of the Court of Appeal on a permission application for residence and contact was limited to a review of the decision of the judge to see whether a prospective appellant had an arguable case, fit to present to the full court on appeal, that the judge's order was plainly wrong. [read post]
31 May 2019, 7:21 pm
Statement of ABA President Bob Carlson, Re: Improper Detention of Immigrant Children WASHINGTON, May 31, 2019 — The American Bar Association is deeply disturbed by reports that hundreds of unaccompanied children seeking refuge in the United States are being held... [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 1:57 am
In re S-B (Children) (Care proceedings: Standard of proof) Supreme Court “When considering who caused injury to a child out of a pool of two or more potential perpetrators, the standard of proof was the civil standard of the balance of probabilities and that standard did not vary according the gravity of the injuries or conduct alleged. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 1:54 am
In re E (Children)(Abduction: Custody Rights) [2011] UKSC 27; [2011] WLR (D) 191 “The application of article 13b of the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (1980) required that the best interests of the child concerned was a primary consideration for the court requested to return an abducted child and, consequently, there was no conflict between the Hague Convention and the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child and no obvious… [read post]
