Search for: "In re Christian S. (1994)"
Results 21 - 40
of 96
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
They asked the question: That when people think about discriminate, the idea that you if you’re a teacher at a Catholic school and the Catholic school decides, oh, you know, we don’t want to have black teachers here, we can do that and we can get rid of them because they’re black. [read post]
10 Apr 2020, 12:30 pm
Guv: It's "tasteless sarcasm" that mocks Christianity. [read post]
21 Apr 2019, 9:01 pm
These programs used to be more common, but in 1994, Congress ended the use of Pell Grants for incarcerated students. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 8:12 pm
It is my great pleasure to pass along the announcement of the publication of Joel Slawotsky's excellent article: "The National Security Exception in US-China FDI and Trade: Lessons from Delaware Corporate Law" which appears in the The Chinese Journal of Comparative Law 6(2):228–264.In this new era defined by the re-creation of global regional economic blocks--one centered in China, and the other in the United States, the issue of national interest in the areas… [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 4:06 am
For example, in In re Carlson Dolls Co., 31 USPQ2d 1319, 1320 (TTAB 1994), the Board held that LITTLE MERMAID for dolls is merely descriptive because "a fictional public domain character like the Little Mermaid of the Hans Christian Anderson fairy tale is not necessarily linked to a specific commercial entity and may be presented in various embodiments . . . and, thus. describes the purpose or function of the goods (i.e., to represent the Little Mermaid of the fairy… [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 8:06 am
On the other hand, the hard places present their own challenges: (1) Russia re-emerging to embrace a role it had started placing well in the wake of the end of the Napoleonic Wars and takes up again, to replace the United States as the shadow under which Europe may be permitted to retain its wealth if not its power, and (2) China as a rising power, not yet militarily (though that is coming) but certainly in trade which poses the greatest threat to the core of the power of the… [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 12:15 pm
If you’re trying to answer the question, “Is Trump policy X evidence of authoritarianism? [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 6:21 pm
Golden's claims.In re: TASHANNA B. [read post]
8 May 2018, 6:37 am
Christian Louboutin subsequently issued a press release claiming the opinion came out in their favour. [read post]
13 Aug 2017, 12:00 am
But you're welcome to read these book reviews.In Black Detroit: A People’s History of Self-Determination, now reviewed in the Washington Post, Herb Boyd “surveys the sights and sounds, personalities and events that defined Detroit as it rose to become the hub and pulse of black working-class life and later devolved to a struggling post-industrial ghost town. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 11:55 am
Gonzales and Christian Henricksen. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 11:55 am
Gonzales and Christian Henricksen. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 6:15 pm
Fish, Stanley, There’s No Such Thing as Free Speech, and It’s a Good Thing Too (1994). [read post]
11 Feb 2017, 10:52 am
London: Christian Action Publications.Bernstein, Hilda (1978) No. 46—Steve Biko. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 6:26 am
In re TC Heartland, LLC, No. 2016-105, at 10 (Fed. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 8:30 am
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit had held (In re Tam), by a 9-to-3 vote, that the exclusion of “disparaging” marks violated the First Amendment. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 10:50 am
” It’s a fence in some places and a wall in others. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 11:48 am
For a case in which a parent was ordered not to engage in anti-homosexuality speech, see this post, about In re E.L.M.C. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 2:50 pm
And it’s done the same for many other marks, as the court opinion I discuss below points out: STOP THE ISLAMIZATION OF AMERICA, THE CHRISTIAN PROSTITUTE, AMISHHOMO, MORMON WHISKEY, KHORAN for wine, HAVE YOU HEARD THAT SATAN IS A REPUBLICAN? [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 6:50 am
See also In re Asbestos School Litigation, 46 F.3d 1284, 1294-96 (3d Cir. 1994) (First Amendment precluded product liability action). [read post]