Search for: "In re Comm. Model Jury Instructions" Results 1 - 9 of 9
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2020, 1:09 am by Schachtman
Perhaps even more to the point, cases at common law “traditionally” did not involve multivariate logistic regression, structural equation models, propensity score weighting, and the like. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 8:49 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Trade dress: Congress relegated it to the Supplemental Register; In re Haig & Haig (Comm’r 1958) Daphne Robert said that she didn’t care what Congress said; 8th Circuit said it was protectable under §43(a) for trade dress of corn hopper. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
See also Coryell, supra, at 77 (instructing the jury "to give damages for example's sake, to prevent such offences in [the] future").A third historical justification, which showed up in some of the early cases, has been noted by recent commentators, and that was the need "to compensate for intangible injuries, compensation which was not otherwise available under the narrow conception of compensatory damages prevalent at the time. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 1:39 pm by Matthew Ackerman
  The corresponding model jury instruction (M Civ JI 90.15) states: “You should determine the value of the property as though this project had not been contemplated. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 10:00 am by Eugene Volokh
Nor could he point to any formal guidance instructing state prosecutors, municipal police departments, or the courts on how to apply New Hampshire's criminal defamation statute to potentially violative speech. [read post]