Search for: "In re Complex Asbestos Litigation (1991)"
Results 1 - 12
of 12
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2010, 9:15 am
& S.D.N.Y. 1991), aff’d, In re Brooklyn Navy Yard Asbestos Litigation (Joint Eastern and Southern District Asbestos Litigation) 971 F.2d 831 (2d Cir. 1992). [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 11:20 am
Does anyone in the judiciary, the legislature, in the public, in industry, in labor, or at the bar, learn anything from the entirety of a complex litigation? [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm
Although science should be about the data and methodology, the growing complexity and inaccessibility of modern science has fostered greater reliance upon reputation of researchers as a proxy for the correctness of factual statements. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 8:07 am
See, e.g., In re Welding Fume Prods. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 1:54 pm
” That’s what you're going to hear. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 10:00 am
The expert report was never used in the prior New York litigation. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 7:13 pm
Asbestos Litig., 827 F. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 6:50 am
See also In re Asbestos School Litigation, 46 F.3d 1284, 1294-96 (3d Cir. 1994) (First Amendment precluded product liability action). [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 6:14 am
App. 2013 (mentioning Kramer as plaintiffs’ expert witness); In re Chan [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
Outboard Marine Corp., 584 So.2d 447, 450 (Ala. 1991); Elliott v. [read post]
17 Oct 2021, 2:17 pm
INTRODUCTION The new, third edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence was released to the public in September 2011, as a joint production of the National Academies of Science, and the Federal Judicial Center. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
As do almost all plaintiffs in prescription drug product liability litigation, she claimed that the drug's label failed to warn adequately of this risk. [read post]
