Search for: "In re Contested Case Hearing re Conservation District Use Application"
Results 21 - 40
of 52
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Nov 2020, 3:00 am
Florida Businessman Pleads Guilty in Fraud Case Involving Giuliani Associates Politico – Josh Gerstein | Published: 10/29/2020 A Florida entrepreneur is the first defendant to plead guilty in a campaign finance and business fraud case involving associates of Rudy Giuliani. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
But Not Everyone Thinks They’re Broken. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 3:00 am
As the case progressed, it became clear that Duncan Hunter had extramarital affairs with five different women and used campaign money to facilitate meetings. [read post]
28 May 2021, 4:00 am
District Court Judge Analisa Torres, citing examples of other cases being dismissed following a presidential reprieve, granted Bannon s application, ruling Trump’s pardon was valid and “dismissal of the Indictment is the proper course. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 10:18 pm
In re Murchison, 349 U. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 11:40 pm
I don't think the findings of two district court judges will control the Court's resolution of this case. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 7:10 am
Conservative legal advocates have criticized judges who enter nationwide injunctions, but Jackson wrote (and the D.C. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 1:14 am
Apple judgment from the Northern District of California, that one is a hotly contested issue. [read post]
20 Sep 2008, 11:29 pm
The lawsuit was brought in the Federal District Court for the District of Columbia, where the library is located. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 3:00 am
The senator used to work for the same firm before taking office. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:28 pm
The court reasoned that even if the contested provisions could overcome the County’s position, the discretion arguably conferred to the Commissioner is only relevant when those discretionary provisions are applied to the approval of a specific permit. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
The court reasoned that even if the contested provisions could overcome the County’s position, the discretion arguably conferred to the Commissioner is only relevant when those discretionary provisions are applied to the approval of a specific permit. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
The court reasoned that even if the contested provisions could overcome the County’s position, the discretion arguably conferred to the Commissioner is only relevant when those discretionary provisions are applied to the approval of a specific permit. [read post]
4 May 2017, 1:57 pm
Because the plaintiffs have the burden of showing likelihood of success on the merits at the preliminary injunction stage, she opted for a more conservative application of precedent and used “intermediate scrutiny. [read post]
3 Apr 2022, 12:23 am
The Rustat memorial The decision of the Ely Consistory Court to reject the application for a faculty to relocate the memorial to Tobias Rustat to another part of Jesus College, away from the College chapel, generated an enormous amount of media comment both for and against the decision: so much so that we have published three posts on the judgment: Rustat memorial: judgment, by David; Dunking, Breaking, Moving, (Re)Making…: Thoughts on the inherent contests of… [read post]
29 Oct 2011, 2:33 pm
After a hearing, an immigration judge denied his applications for relief from removal, but granted him voluntary departure. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
CASES PENDING AT THE CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT There are 2 CEQA case pending at the California Supreme Court. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
CASES PENDING AT THE CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT There are 2 CEQA case pending at the California Supreme Court. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 10:06 pm
The Third Appellate District addressed this issue in a recent decision involving a statutorily mandated EIR prepared by the state Department of Conservation (“Department”) concerning fracking. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 6:00 am
In Eldridge v British Columbia, the Court found that the failure of hospitals to provide sign-language services for hearing-impaired patients was a violation of section 15. [read post]
