Search for: "In re Cooper, Petitioner" Results 41 - 60 of 172
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Dec 2015, 5:00 am
The petitioner was subject to mandatory detention pursuant to INA § 236(c). [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
Indeed, as amicus curae National Association of Manufacturers aptly points out, the court’s requiring of the petitioner to do so here, “is tantamount to requiring that Cooper Tire violate federal anti-discrimination and harassment laws, including Title VII and [42 U.S.C. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 7:48 pm
Mukasey, No. 06-1469 "An order terminating petitioner's grant of deferred removal under the CAT is vacated and remanded where the petitioner was deprived of his right to a fair hearing by the IJ's apparent bias against him and reliance on unfounded assumptions about homosexuals" [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 4:02 am by Marty Lederman
 And, here, given the presumed non-cooperation of objecting employers, the government could not know the identities of the women at issue to target them for outreach and education. [read post]
11 Jul 2015, 8:16 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Smith acknowledged the cooperation of all parties and the superb care that D was receiving at the hospital. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 6:36 am
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2014)Venkatesh Nayak, Programme Coordinator, Access to Information Programme, Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative in New Delhi, has requested the circulation of the following essay, entitled "Promulgating Ordinances – Public Scrutiny and Judicial Review. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 5:32 am
”) (citations omitted); In re Cellular Telephones, 2014 WL 7793690, at *9 (Mag. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 12:30 pm by John Elwood
Harris, 15-1262 (which eventually will be recaptioned as Cooper v. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 9:04 am by John Elwood
We’re not quite back in every-term-a-blockbuster mode, but October Term 2017 is looking not too shabby. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 1:18 pm by John Elwood
Hewlett-Packard Co., 15-1130, and Cooper v. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 9:48 am by Abbott & Kindermann
The appellate court first dismissed the SLC’s claims that petitioner failed to exhaust its administrative remedies, despite petitioner’s attendance at the hearing and access to a staff report that indicated the SLC intended to find the land exchange exempt from CEQA. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 2:30 pm
LESSER/European Pressphoto Agency) From today’s decision in In re James v. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 6:38 pm
That much is clear from the opinion’s use of the singular, “the petitioner. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 8:45 am by WIMS
Petitioners challenge the Memorandum re: the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule on procedural and substantive grounds. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 3:18 pm by Kiera Flynn
Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioners’ reply _____________________________________________ The following petitions have been re-listed from the Conference of September 26, 2011: Utah Highway Patrol Ass’n v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 4:04 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
(2) Is the enactment of a zoning ordinance allowing the operation of medical marijuana cooperatives in certain areas the type of activity that may cause a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change to the environment? [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 4:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
In support of the latter argument, both in his lower and appellate court briefs, Donovan relied primarily on In re Seneca Investments, LLC, 2008 WL 4329230 (Del. [read post]