Search for: "In re Cooper, Petitioner"
Results 61 - 80
of 245
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2023, 3:00 am
Res. [read post]
14 Aug 2021, 6:31 am
Failure of the petitioner to answer the status call shall result in a dismissal for want of prosecution. [read post]
11 Jul 2015, 8:16 pm
Smith acknowledged the cooperation of all parties and the superb care that D was receiving at the hospital. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 1:05 pm
Judge Miller denied the ore tenus motion and reset the case to commence re-trial July 16, 2102. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 6:36 am
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2014)Venkatesh Nayak, Programme Coordinator, Access to Information Programme, Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative in New Delhi, has requested the circulation of the following essay, entitled "Promulgating Ordinances – Public Scrutiny and Judicial Review. [read post]
1 Jan 2020, 1:33 am
In Indian Farmers Fertilizers Cooperative Ltd. [read post]
8 Jan 2022, 6:39 am
” In re Marriage of Hightower, 358 Ill. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 4:54 pm
A list of all petitions we’re watching is available here. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 5:32 am
”) (citations omitted); In re Cellular Telephones, 2014 WL 7793690, at *9 (Mag. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 12:30 pm
Harris, 15-1262 (which eventually will be recaptioned as Cooper v. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 9:04 am
We’re not quite back in every-term-a-blockbuster mode, but October Term 2017 is looking not too shabby. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 1:18 pm
Hewlett-Packard Co., 15-1130, and Cooper v. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 2:31 pm
“Petitioner may deny respondent access to the minor child if, when respondent arrives for parenting time, respondent is under the influence of drugs or alcohol and constitutes a threat to the safety and well-being of petitioner or petitioner’s minor children or is behaving in a violent or abusive manner. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 9:48 am
The appellate court first dismissed the SLC’s claims that petitioner failed to exhaust its administrative remedies, despite petitioner’s attendance at the hearing and access to a staff report that indicated the SLC intended to find the land exchange exempt from CEQA. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 1:44 pm
Cooper, 10-209, and Missouri v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 2:30 pm
LESSER/European Pressphoto Agency) From today’s decision in In re James v. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 6:38 pm
That much is clear from the opinion’s use of the singular, “the petitioner. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 9:42 pm
The Montana Supreme Court rejected petitioners’ claim that this statute violates the First Amendment. 2011 MT 328, 363 Mont. 220, 271 P. 3d 1. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 3:18 pm
Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioners’ reply _____________________________________________ The following petitions have been re-listed from the Conference of September 26, 2011: Utah Highway Patrol Ass’n v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 4:04 pm
(2) Is the enactment of a zoning ordinance allowing the operation of medical marijuana cooperatives in certain areas the type of activity that may cause a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change to the environment? [read post]
