Search for: "In re Corrigan" Results 21 - 40 of 134
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2018, 9:01 pm by Dan Flynn
From the limited perspective of some of their public actions, it appears that Rottenberg and Kiecker are taking a page from World War II Admiral Chester Nimitz, who was famous for saying: “When you’re in command, COMMAND!! [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Sovereign Immunity, Absolute Immunity, Qualified Immunity, Use Immunity, Transaction Immunity and Qualified Privilege claims that may be advanced by public officers and employees involved in litigation and, or, administrative hearingsBelow is an example of the material posted on NYPPL. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 1:10 pm
Chin, Corrigan, Liu, Cuéllar. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 2:11 pm
(In re Ricardo C. (2013) 220 Cal.App.4th 688, 698; accord, In re Jermaine B. (1999) 69 Cal.App.4th 634, 639 [plea bargaining is an accepted practice in juvenile delinquency proceedings].)A plea agreement is a tripartite agreement which requires the consent of the defendant, the People and the court. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 11:19 am
 And in an opinion (1) by Justice Corrigan, that's (2) less than a dozen double-spaced pages. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 12:46 pm
 Once we're there, it seems more important to me to expand upon the analysis rather than a (somewhat distracting) discourse on the particular path through which we wound up in our present predicament. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 2:14 pm
 And in an opinion (1) by Justice Corrigan, that's (2) less than a dozen double-spaced pages. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 1:52 pm
(The caveats in Justice Corrigan's opinion on this point are similarly sensible. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 11:29 am
Today's opinion from the California Supreme Court sounds exactly like what I would say to one of my first-year law students who was confused about res judicata.Justice Corrigan's opinion is careful, patient and slow. [read post]
27 May 2015, 12:56 am by Andres
Our concern emanated from the Home Secretary’s attempt to characterise the Bill, which substantially expanded investigatory powers, as merely a re-affirmation of the pre-existing data retention regime.[1] Since that letter was written, it has become apparent that the introduction of the DRIP Bill was not the only time an expansion of surveillance powers was presented in a way seemingly designed to stifle robust democratic consideration. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 4:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
On Tuesday, March 3, 2015, I attended the oral argument in In re Cipro Cases I & II, No. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 4:15 am by Timothy P. Flynn
 Then former Governor John Engler appointed Corrigan to the Michigan Court of Appeals and the Michigan Supreme Court; she was re-elected in each position before being appointed DHS Director.When she took over DHS, Corrigan was tasked with cleaning-up the rampant fraud that was draining cash and food assistance programs of their funds. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 4:34 am by David DePaolo
"The rule we adopt is limited to professional home health care workers who are trained and employed by an agency," Corrigan said. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 5:08 am
Tuesday 15th July 2014To all Members of Parliament,Re: An open letter from UK internet law academic expertsOn Thursday 10 July the Coalition Government (with support from the Opposition) published draft emergency legislation, the Data Retention and Investigatory Powers Bill (“DRIP”). [read post]