Search for: "In re Dabney" Results 1 - 20 of 44
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2009, 6:01 am by tom
  We’re starting to lay the track. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 11:13 am by Dennis Crouch
By Dennis Crouch In re TC Heartland LLC (on mandamus to the Fed Cir. 2015) (read-it: Heartland Mand) An interesting mandamus action was recently filed by the Prof John Duffy and Jim Dabney (both now with Hughes Hubbard) raising the following: Whether 28 U.S.C. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 5:44 pm by Bruce Thomas
  And if you’re looking for substance, I’d suggest that you read it now. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 1:55 pm
While pending in the Federal Circuit, the case was known by the short name In re Teles AG, No. 12-1297 (Fed. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 5:47 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
DABNEY: Can you remind me what that --JUSTICE BREYER: That is, you're asking usto decide where venue is proper for a corporation, andyou are not a corporation. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 9:51 am by Jeremy Gordon
Judge Dabney Friedrich denied Concord’s motion, prompting Concord to move to intervene at the appeals level. [read post]
28 Nov 2006, 6:51 am
Look here for a discussion of the brief of the 24 law professors and the In re Lee case. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 5:00 am by Law Office of Justin T. Surginer
Assess Your (Alcoholic) Risk Breathalyzer by ann-dabney / CC BY-ND 2.0 The first thing you need to assess is whether you’re likely to be over the legal limit or not. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 10:26 am by Anushka Limaye
We rely on contributions from our generous readers, and now, as a thank you, we're offering a Lawfare challenge coin! [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 8:23 am by Sasha Volokh
If you're a lawyer, you should be aware that we're offering three credits of Continuing Legal Education (CLE) credit if you attend the conference on Friday, March 22. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 11:23 am by Sasha Volokh
If you're a lawyer, you should be aware that we're offering three credits of Continuing Legal Education (CLE) credit if you attend the conference on Friday, March 22. [read post]
30 Nov 2006, 10:11 am
Dabney replied that it would not, but without much elaboration. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 6:20 am
If you’re interested in these issues, you might want to look at the public discussion on slaw.ca (a bit hard to find all of it in one place), at Bruce’s response here, and at an earlier blog post responding to the same arguments from West employee Dan Dabney. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Meyer, Employer Handbook] “You’re NOT Paranoid — The Agencies ARE Ganging Up” [Dabney Ware, Foley & Lardner] “The U.S. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 4:48 am by Ronald Mann
Dabney (Art Lien) Pressing the point again and again through Dabney’s presentation, Ginsburg found particularly telling Dabney’s concession that no statute explicitly limits venue so narrowly: [Y]ou are asking us to say that venue in a patent infringement case is only where the entity is incorporated or comparable to that, and you have acknowledged that there is no other venue provision for any other kind of claim that is so limited to just the place of… [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 12:18 pm by Sasha Volokh
Please come represent the readership of the Volokh Conspiracy, and say hi to me when you're there! [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Cutting Corners and the Question of Quality – Pam Woldow and Doug Richardson on Pam’s blog, At The Intersection Franchisee Insurance: Four Issues You Should Be Thinking About – Seattle lawyer Doug Berry of Graham & Dunn on the firm’s ZorBlog You’re NOT Paranoid – the Agencies ARE Ganging Up – Jacksonville lawyer Dabney Ware of Foley & Lardner on the firm’s blog, Labor & Employment Law Perspectives Sovereign Litigation in… [read post]