Search for: "In re Dabney" Results 21 - 40 of 45
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2017, 5:47 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
DABNEY: Can you remind me what that --JUSTICE BREYER: That is, you're asking usto decide where venue is proper for a corporation, andyou are not a corporation. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 11:13 am by Dennis Crouch
By Dennis Crouch In re TC Heartland LLC (on mandamus to the Fed Cir. 2015) (read-it: Heartland Mand) An interesting mandamus action was recently filed by the Prof John Duffy and Jim Dabney (both now with Hughes Hubbard) raising the following: Whether 28 U.S.C. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 1:55 pm
While pending in the Federal Circuit, the case was known by the short name In re Teles AG, No. 12-1297 (Fed. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Meyer, Employer Handbook] “You’re NOT Paranoid — The Agencies ARE Ganging Up” [Dabney Ware, Foley & Lardner] “The U.S. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 5:00 am by Randi Morrison
Board Cybersecurity Oversight Duties Grounded in In Re Caremark This recent Gibson Dunn article addresses the standards that govern the board’s fiduciary duties to monitor and minimize cybersecurity risk based on In re Caremark and its progeny, and identifies certain steps boards should take to ensure compliance with their risk management oversight responsibilities. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Cutting Corners and the Question of Quality – Pam Woldow and Doug Richardson on Pam’s blog, At The Intersection Franchisee Insurance: Four Issues You Should Be Thinking About – Seattle lawyer Doug Berry of Graham & Dunn on the firm’s ZorBlog You’re NOT Paranoid – the Agencies ARE Ganging Up – Jacksonville lawyer Dabney Ware of Foley & Lardner on the firm’s blog, Labor & Employment Law Perspectives Sovereign Litigation in… [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 4:33 am by Bruce Thomas
 Of course it’s Title 36 — we’re in a park, silly. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 4:33 am by Bruce Thomas
 Of course it’s Title 36 — we’re in a park, silly. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 11:40 am by kfogel
Julien Dabney from Julien Dabney on Sun, 2011-12-18 12:08 Im thankful for the article.Really thank you! [read post]
21 Aug 2011, 3:49 am by Alfred Brophy
Anyway, if you're looking for a very fine study that links ideas and social history, I would urge you to look at Young's important book. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 5:40 pm by Colin O'Keefe
If that's not what you're looking for, every other post comments on a different area of the law. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 7:01 pm by Colin O'Keefe
The dog days of summer are officially here but we're still seeing some great analysis across the LexBlog Network. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 3:26 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Where yesterday's roundup came much later than usual, we're going to get today's out a little bit earlier. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 6:20 am
If you’re interested in these issues, you might want to look at the public discussion on (a bit hard to find all of it in one place), at Bruce’s response here, and at an earlier blog post responding to the same arguments from West employee Dan Dabney. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 11:56 am by tamsin_maxwell
The reason is that each group holds only a piece of the solution to the puzzle, and as pointed out in an earlier post, they’re talking past each other. [read post]
9 May 2007, 5:25 pm
" KSR's brief never cited In re Kotzab, 217 F.3d 1365, or Ruiz v. [read post]