Search for: "In re Daniel F." Results 401 - 420 of 718
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2012, 1:41 am by tekEditor
Kalpakian 446 F.2d 738 (9th Cir. 1971) 14 In re Katz Interactive Call Processing Patent Litig. 712 F. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 2:38 am
According to The Providence Journal articles, these judicial concerns have already resulted in two changes for transfer transactions in Rhode Island: Superior Court Presiding Justice Joseph F. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 1:15 pm
But Robert's attorney, Daniel Lapointe Kent, called the gesture inadequate. [read post]
16 May 2018, 2:00 am by Tammy Binford
He cites author Daniel Coyle when explaining that the conscious mind can manage maybe 40 pieces of data a second, but the unconscious mind may be processing 11 million pieces of data per second. [read post]
23 May 2011, 2:20 am by Kelly
(TTABlog) TTAB affirms mere descriptiveness refusal of JEWELRYSUPPLY.COM: No tacking and not enough 2(f): In re Jewelry Supply Inc (TTABlog) TTAB affirms refusal of the “Eddie Bauer Guarantee” for failure to function as a service mark: In re Eddie Bauer Licensing Services LLC (TTABlog) TTAB dismisses fraud-based opposition for failure to prove intent to deceive: Daniel Ryan Way and CMDW, Inc. v. [read post]
16 May 2018, 2:00 am by Tammy Binford
He cites author Daniel Coyle when explaining that the conscious mind can manage maybe 40 pieces of data a second, but the unconscious mind may be processing 11 million pieces of data per second. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 10:02 am by Jack D
Ces orientations ont été confirmées par le Président national, Maître Jean Daniel Lachkar, au cours de son allocution faisant références aux apports de la loi Béteille. [read post]
16 May 2018, 2:00 am by Tammy Binford
He cites author Daniel Coyle when explaining that the conscious mind can manage maybe 40 pieces of data a second, but the unconscious mind may be processing 11 million pieces of data per second. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 4:18 pm by Kevin LaCroix
”[11] Analysis The Goldman Sachs case—along with Barclays and In re Petrobras Securities[12]—is one of three recent 23(f) petitions granted and decided by the Second Circuit concerning the fraud-on-the-market presumption of reliance. [read post]