Search for: "In re Danielle J" Results 1 - 20 of 947
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Aug 2007, 9:44 pm
Ambrogi, Editor-in-Chief) is an article on re-examination by Daniel W. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 9:41 am
Daniel Sokol Oliver Budzinski and Jürgen-Peter Kretschmer of the University of Marburg Department of Economics discuss Implications of Unprofitable Horizontal Mergers: A Re-Interpretation of the Farrell-Shapiro-Framework. [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 10:20 am by Paul Caron
Danielle Tully (Brooklyn), The Cultural (Re)Turn: The Case for Teaching Culturally Responsive Lawyering, 16 Stan. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 11:51 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Juvenile Law Opinions Body: AC36068 - In re Daniel A. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 3:00 am by Paul Caron
Daniel Milstein (J,D, 2011, Cardozo), Note, 'Til Death Do Us File Joint Income Tax Returns (Unless We're Gay), 9 Cardozo Pub. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 2:16 pm by Media Law Prof
Richards, Washington University Law School, and Daniel J. [read post]
20 Dec 2009, 7:29 pm by Jill Michaux
BELOW MEDIAN MUST RUN 36 MONTHS, B22C IS TEMPORAL In re Daniel, Case No. 06-20714 December 2006, Judge Somers In a Below Median case, debtor's income is determined by B22C and expenses by Schedule J and must "run" for 36 months (The Applicable Commitment Period) or pay 100% of all allowed unsecured claims. [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 12:39 pm
  Netflix and Not-So-Chill: The Legality of Sharing Passwords for Netflix and Other Streaming Servicesby John MixonRequest for Re-Examination ("RRE") Practice in South Korea: A Proposal to Make the RRE Fair and Efficientby Hyojeong SonIP Protection for Vegetatively Reproduced Plants: New Paths Forwardby Marcelo Pomeranz, Chris Holly, Daniel J. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 2:03 pm by Bartolus
Mr Niilo Jääskinen is apointed Advocate general until October 6th 2015 (replacing Mr Luis Miguel Poiares Pessoa Maduro). [read post]
8 May 2012, 6:31 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The conclusion of IN RE HUGH EDWARD MONTGOMERY, JOHN FRANCIS MARTIN, and JORGE DANIEL ERUSALIMSKY  : We thus affirm the rejection of claims 42, 43, and 45 of the ’824 application as anticipated by HOPE. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver
These are from Andrew Mueller, the Managing Director of the [applicant], Daniel Rosenthal, the [applicant’s] Australian patent attorney, and Sheila McLean, an administrator with the [applicant’s] Australian patent attorney. [read post]