Search for: "In re Danielle J" Results 301 - 320 of 644
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2020, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
The Law Society Gazette had a piece “A CJEU case that may affect our data protection re EU post-Brexit”. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 4:55 am
In a dispute between Christie’s France and Syndicat National des Antiquaires, the French Supreme Court has ruled that the re-sale right royalty is owed by the buyer and not the seller, which has overturned the position in place since 1920. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 11:07 am by Jordan Brunner
  Lisa Daniels summarized In re Search Warrant No. 16-960-M-01 to Google. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Re-Examining Customary International Law and the Federal Courts. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
  Quite the contrary, Third Restatement’s drafters criticized comment j’s presumption language as “unfortunate” and stated that it shouldn’t be followed. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 3:02 am
A decisão foi tomada na análise do HC 106566, impetrado em defesa do empresário Daniel Dantas. [read post]
16 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
The jury in the Paudie Coffey libel case has been unable to reach a verdict and it seems that there is likely to be a re-trial. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 9:00 am
"Part of the problem is that the Internet makes it hard to visualize the breadth of our exposure," said Daniel J. [read post]
28 May 2020, 5:29 am by Schachtman
Despite the confusing verbiage, these judicial rulings are a serious deviation from the text of Rule 702, as well as the Advisory Committee Note to the 2000 Amendments, which embraced the standard articulated in In re Paoli, that “any step that renders the analysis unreliable . . . renders the expert’s testimony inadmissible. [read post]