Search for: "In re Garnett"
Results 1 - 20
of 112
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Sep 2013, 4:31 pm
Garnett’s correspondence. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 4:23 pm
The Kansas Department of Health and Environment (KDHE) and the Southeast Kansas Multi-County Health Department (SEKMCHD) are in the preliminary stages of investigating individuals ill with campylobacteriosis possibly associated with Trade Winds Bar and Grill in Garnett, Kansas. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 1:31 pm
Lots of interesting points by Joy Garnett in the comments too. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 9:23 am
Law Lessons from TOM AND GARNETT HUFF V. [read post]
2 Dec 2007, 5:27 am
Our own Rick Garnett will be part of a rock-star event (for con law nerds) next week at Princeton. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 8:55 am
In addition to summarizing and re-stating claims made by the author in earlier work – claims having to do with, among other things, church-state separation, the no-establishment rule, legal and social pluralism, and the structural role played by religious and other institutions – the Article attempts to strengthen the argument that the idea of “the freedom of the church” (or something like it) is not a relic or anachronism but instead remains a crucial component of… [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 2:59 pm
Lee ordered Garnett released and Garnett, desparately seeking redemption, died in Pickett’s Charge at Gettysburg. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 3:31 am
Garnett What The Constitution in 2020 calls a "progressive vision of constitutional law in the years ahead" should, I believe, re-discover, incorporate, and emphasize what might seem a not-very-progressive - because very old - idea. [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 6:52 am
Rick Garnett recently wrote on "cities' hipness competition. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 2:14 pm
Please tell us your first name and where you’re calling from. [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 4:39 am
It is a dramatic overreach, and an unwelcome departure, for these laws to be used not to facilitate equal access to commerce and civil society but to punitively re-educate those with traditional, or now-disfavored, views about controversial questions. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 2:38 am
Of course they're prejudicial, which is why they're in evidence, but that can't be blamed on the press.Worse still, the ruling belies the emptiness of one of our beloved legal fictions, that the judge's instructions to the jury not to read about the case or discuss it outside the courtroom matters. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 10:58 pm
The image above, posted by an Illinois State Senator following the Dobbs ruling (and referred to in Rick Garnett’s First Things piece) reflects the hate directed toward Catholics as a result of the Church’s efforts to protect and foster unborn human life. [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 4:00 am
No one will be required to "observe" Daylight Saving Time, so long as they show up for whatever they're required to show up for at the right time. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 11:01 am
Oh sure, they’re in first place in their division. [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 12:26 pm
In addition to Marc's two recent and helpful posts, here are a few items from the MOJ archives that might be worth (re!) [read post]
2 May 2016, 4:00 am
Garnett, Wrongful Discrimination? [read post]
11 Nov 2016, 11:00 am
Garnett, who is more mature than I am). [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 3:17 am
Randy Barnett and Josh Blackman: yes, the confirmation process had gone wrong, but not necessarily in the way we’re told [National Affairs] A case against judicial restraint [Ilya Shapiro, same, related Cato] “Business and the Roberts Court without Scalia” [Jonathan Adler, related on supposed “pro-business” Court] SCOTUS should (again) step in to reject Obama end-run around advice/consent on appointment power [Ilya Shapiro and Thomas Berry, Cato] The… [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 7:12 am
They're toast this year. [read post]
