Search for: "In re Gault" Results 1 - 20 of 71
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Aug 2019, 7:28 pm by Gavriella Roisman
7 Feb 2019, 8:59 am by PaulKostro
In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1, 33-34, 41 (1967) (holding a juvenile and his parents are entitled to “timely notice, in advance of [a] hearing” and notification of the juvenile’s right to counsel). [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 4:49 am by Mario Machado
It’s one thing for an appellate court to refuse to extend In re Gault to kids in immigration proceedings, but for an associate chief Immigration Judge to make such a fantastic remark is another. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 3:37 am by Scott Bomboy
Due process rights for teenagers In 1968, the Court ruled in an 8-1 decision in the case of In re Gault that teens accused of crimes are entitled to the same due process rights as adults. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 9:10 am by Harold O'Grady
” The Brooklyn Law School Library has in its collection The Constitutional Rights of Children: In re Gault and Juvenile Justice by David S. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 6:57 am by PaulKostro
The court held this to be so more than four decades ago in the wake of In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1, 41 (1967) (holding children entitled to due process protections in juvenile delinquency proceedings). [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 4:00 am by David Houck
In reference to this order, Spath said: “I don’t know what authority I have, but we’re going to test it. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 4:00 am by John Rubin
This year, juvenile justice stakeholders around the country celebrated the 50th anniversary of In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 (1967), the United States Supreme Court decision that transformed practice in juvenile delinquency cases. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 10:00 am by Yishai Schwartz
Finally, on re-direct examination, Spath again pressed Olson-Gault on whether the guidelines are binding on the military commissions. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 7:08 am by MBettman
”) In re D.S., 2016-Ohio-7369 (Kennedy, J., concurring in the judgment) (In a prior juvenile case involving a juvenile’s admission of guilt, Justice Kennedy applied criminal plain-error to a mutual mistake of law, which caused a “manifest injustice,” without considering whether this error was outcome determinative.) [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 9:00 am
As a prominent constitutional law scholar, Norman persuaded the Supreme Court to extend due process protections to juvenile proceedings (In re Gault, 1967) and to recognize equal protection rights for non-marital children (Levy v. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 5:29 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
Ambrose and George Yeannakis (University of Washington - School of Law and Washington State Office of Public Defense) have posted The Magna Carta for Juveniles: In Re Gault Turns 50 (NWLawyer, June 2017, pp. 34-39) on SSRN. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 12:33 pm by Alfred Brophy
It was in this role as general counsel that Norman worked on some of the great civil liberties cases of the century, including arguing and winning In re Gault in the Supreme Court, which guaranteed due process rights to juveniles charged with crimes. [read post]
31 May 2017, 7:30 am by MBettman
In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 (1967) (“[d]ue process of law is the primary and indispensable foundation of individual freedom. [read post]
23 May 2017, 2:55 pm by James S. Friedman, LLC
50 years ago last week, the United States Supreme Court decided In re Gault, which guaranteed juvenile defendants many of the same due process rights held by adult criminal defendants. [read post]
15 May 2017, 2:02 pm by Katharina Hering
Source: Record Group 267: Records of the Supreme Court of the United States, 1772 – 2007 Series: Appellate Jurisdiction Case Files, 1792 – 2010, File Unit: Case File 116, October Term 1966, In Re Gault. [read post]
11 May 2017, 4:35 am by Edith Roberts
” In The Staten Island Advance, Daniel Leddy marks the 50th anniversary of In re Gault, a Supreme Court decision that “accorded accused children constitutional rights that had been routinely denied to them on the theory that juvenile delinquency proceedings, being rehabilitative in purpose, were civil in nature,” and that “remains the most important pronouncement ever made by the Supreme Court on children and the law. [read post]