Search for: "In re Gault" Results 21 - 40 of 72
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Aug 2019, 7:28 pm by Gavriella Roisman
52 YEARS AFTER IN RE GAULT, THE JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEM CONTINUES TO EVOLVE IN WAYS ADDRESSING THE UNIQUE CIRCUMSTANCES OF CHILDREN AND, ULTIMATELY, HOW STATES CAN FULFILL THE GOAL OF REHABILITATION AS OPPOSED TO PUNISHMENT. [read post]
18 Jan 2014, 9:30 pm by Emily Prifogle
In 1967, Justice William Brennan posed this question during oral arguments in In re Gault. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 4:00 am by John Rubin
This year, juvenile justice stakeholders around the country celebrated the 50th anniversary of In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 (1967), the United States Supreme Court decision that transformed practice in juvenile delinquency cases. [read post]
3 May 2015, 5:45 am by SHG
In the New York Times Sunday Review, Ylonda Gault Caviness writes from the perspective of a black mom. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 3:30 pm by David Tanenhaus
Neither justice mentions In re Gault, the 1967 Arizona case the Supreme Court agreed to hear exactly one week after announcing Miranda v. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 5:38 pm by Caroline Ibrahim
As attorneys and law students who are extremely passionate about representing and advocating for youth, it was a true honor to be able to celebrate the 50th anniversary of the In re Gault, the case that gave juveniles the right to counsel. [read post]
14 May 2007, 2:52 pm
Washington is in the minority of states that do not provide legal counsel to all children in abuse and neglect proceedings, Seattle P-I, May 11, 2007.By the way, May 15 is the 40th anniversary of In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1, Findlaw (1967), the landmark case that gave juveniles accused of crimes the same right to counsel enjoyed by adults. [read post]
28 May 2012, 2:00 am by Karen Tani
Tanenhaus, The Constitutional Rights of Children: In re Gault and Juvenile Justice (University Press of Kansas). [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 8:26 am by Mary L. Dudziak
  An expert in the history of the constitutional rights of children, David's most recent book is The Constitutional Rights of Children: In re Gault and Juvenile Justice (University Press of Kansas, 2011). [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 11:14 am by Camille Van Kote
This year’s conference will be celebrating the 50th Anniversary of In re Gault, the landmark Supreme Court case, granting children the right to counsel in delinquency cases. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 9:44 am by Dominique Villareal
The report released Monday comes in the midst of the organization’s yearlong campaign “Gault at 50,” which seeks to improve access to quality legal counsel for juveniles in the lead up to the 50th anniversary of the Supreme Court’s 1967 In re Gault decision. [read post]
10 Apr 2016, 9:37 am by Maia McCoy
Children gained the right to counsel in the adjudicatory hearing of a juvenile court proceeding via the due process clause of the 14th Amendment in the landmark case of In re Gault. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 12:00 am
Colloquium co-sponsors are the law school’s Juvenile Rights and Re-Entry Project – Civil Justice Clinic, the Missouri State Public Defender’s Office, the Gephardt Institute for Public Service and the National Juvenile Defender Center. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 3:37 am by Scott Bomboy
Due process rights for teenagers In 1968, the Court ruled in an 8-1 decision in the case of In re Gault that teens accused of crimes are entitled to the same due process rights as adults. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 2:29 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Pennsylvania, a series of decisions by the United States Supreme Court, most notably the decision In re Gault, inaugurated sweeping constitutional reforms of the rights of juveniles in this country as seen in In re Dennis M. and Matter of Benjamin L. [read post]
11 May 2017, 4:35 am by Edith Roberts
” In The Staten Island Advance, Daniel Leddy marks the 50th anniversary of In re Gault, a Supreme Court decision that “accorded accused children constitutional rights that had been routinely denied to them on the theory that juvenile delinquency proceedings, being rehabilitative in purpose, were civil in nature,” and that “remains the most important pronouncement ever made by the Supreme Court on children and the law. [read post]
15 May 2007, 2:58 pm
Jerry Falwell's "substantial, if unintended contribution to First Amendment jurisprudence" and this post about the anniversary of the In re Gault decision. [read post]