Search for: "In re Gault"
Results 61 - 80
of 83
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2014, 12:53 pm
In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 (1967). [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 8:13 pm
Justice Abe Fortas wrote the majority opinion (likely informed, Shackelford noted, by his opinion two years earlier in another minors’ rights case, In re Gault); the Tinkers celebrated their victory by eating ice cream and drinking ginger ale. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 12:38 pm
He was re-elected without opposition from 1994 to 2018. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 4:49 am
It’s one thing for an appellate court to refuse to extend In re Gault to kids in immigration proceedings, but for an associate chief Immigration Judge to make such a fantastic remark is another. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 1:09 pm
Supreme Court would take review of a number of other right to counsel situations, and continue widening its application to (1) children in juvenile delinquency proceedings (In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 (1967))and (2) indigent defendants facing misdemeanor charges in state courts that involved possible loss of freedom (jail time) (Argersinger v. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 7:45 am
 In order to fulfill the promises of Gideon and Gault, we need the engagement of partners at the federal, state, and local levels, both within and outside of government. [read post]
6 Aug 2007, 5:21 am
.: Back to the Future: Forty Years of In Re Gault (CLE)
Room 2010, 2 nd Flr. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 1:25 pm
., to include juveniles (In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1, 1967); those charged with misdemeanor crimes that carry jail sentences (Argersinger v. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 8:23 am
In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 (1967) (“[N]either the Fourteenth Amendment nor the Bill of Rights is for adults alone. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 6:30 am
In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 (1967). [read post]
31 May 2017, 7:30 am
In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 (1967) (“[d]ue process of law is the primary and indispensable foundation of individual freedom. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 9:06 pm
Along parallel lines, David Tanenhaus' The Constitutional Rights of Children recovers the context of In re Gault and teaches us, in that way, about the state of juvenile justice now. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 8:55 am
[1] The Court noted analogous, but not controlling, decisions in civil cases involving juvenile delinquency, In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 (1967); involuntary hospitalization of inmates, Vitek v. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 8:12 am
In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 (1967). [read post]
3 Jun 2007, 2:35 pm
IN RE GAULT (1967)--Case that determined the Constitution requires a separate juvenile justice system with certain standard procedures and protections, but still not as many as in adult systems. [read post]
7 Jan 2017, 8:26 am
”) In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 (1967) (“[N]either the Fourteenth Amendment nor the Bill of Rights is for adults alone. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 5:58 am
In re Gault, 367 U.S. 1 (1967). [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 1:07 pm
Finding it would serve no public purpose, the master recommended that none be re-tried.[13] That meant 4,500 cases of children appearing in that court from 2003 to 2008.[14] On October 29, 2009, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court agreed. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 6:58 am
In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 (1967) (Holding that children, like adults, are entitled to due process and fair treatment.) [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 7:08 am
”) In re D.S., 2016-Ohio-7369 (Kennedy, J., concurring in the judgment) (In a prior juvenile case involving a juvenile’s admission of guilt, Justice Kennedy applied criminal plain-error to a mutual mistake of law, which caused a “manifest injustice,” without considering whether this error was outcome determinative.) [read post]
