Search for: "In re Geoffrey G. (1979)" Results 1 - 5 of 5
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2018, 9:22 am by Schachtman
The consensus falls apart over the merits of Selikoff’s actual research, his credentials, and his advocacy tactics.1 Selikoff’s collaborators, protégés, and fellow travelers tend to brand any challenge or criticism as “scurrilous. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm by admin
The consensus falls apart over the merits of Selikoff’s actual research, his credentials, and his advocacy tactics.[1] Selikoff’s collaborators, protégés, and fellow travelers tend to brand any challenge or criticism as “scurrilous. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm by Schachtman
Marxist historians Jock McCulloch and Geoffrey Tweedale, and others, have attacked Bartrip for serving as an apologist for industry, and have suggested, in their publications, that Selikoff testified infrequently:= “[Selikoff] gave testimony in two of the early landmark legal cases, but thereafter avoided the drama of the courtroom and the role of the expert witness, not only because it would have been a drain on his time and made his confidentia [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 6:56 pm
It can also be understood as shared perceptions of the meaning of reality backed by massive background consensus (Jürgen Habermas, Between Facts and Norms (William Rehg (trans) MIT Press, 1996); pp. 22, 322); or as biopolitics (the narratives through which social and political power may be normalized over the control and management of the bodies of the living and their relationship to physical and abstract objects and the technologies of control) (Michel Foucault, The Birth of… [read post]