Search for: "In re Griffin"
Results 41 - 60
of 719
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2020, 7:36 am
by guest author Melanie Griffin Bar exam season is in full swing, but there’s no need to panic. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 4:36 am
It’s almost as if we’re having a serious conversation about copyright reform. [read post]
7 May 2019, 6:27 am
United States, No. 18-10523 (April 29, 2019), Denial of Rehearing En Banc The Court denied the petitioner’s request for a rehearing en banc, leaving in place the rule in In re Griffin that provisions of the Sentencing Guidelines cannot be challenged as void-for-vagueness and that the Supreme Court’s rule in Johnson is… The post Stony Lester v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 3:06 pm
We are writing in Lavonne Griffin-Valade for mayor, and we hope other Portlanders follow suit. [read post]
12 May 2020, 9:17 am
by guest author Melanie Griffin The UofSC Law Library extends its usefulness way beyond its physical walls, now more than ever. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 1:53 pm
by guest author Melanie Griffin Finding a focus topic is when law school really gets interesting. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 12:21 pm
The FBA presents a Webinar: Honoring the Legacy of Associate Justice Sandra Day O’Connor(January 25 @ 2:00 pm - 3:00 pm EST) -- The Federal Bar Association is honored to welcome three of Justice Sandra Day O’Connor’s incredibly successful former law clerks – Professor Lisa Griffin (Duke), Professor Oona Hathaway (Yale), and Silvija Strikis (Partner, Kellogg, Hansen, Todd, Figel & Frederick, PLLC) – to discuss her 25 years as an Associate Justice… [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 3:38 am
IRS Staffer to Address Section 162(m) Uncertainties During Tomorrow's Webcast We're excited to have Ken Griffin, Associate General Counsel in the IRS' Executive Compensation Branch (and the Staffer who signed the PLR at issue) join the panel for tomorrow's webcast on CompensationStandards.com - "The New IRS Letter Ruling: How It Impacts Your Employment Arrangements, Accounting, Proxy Disclosures, Etc. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 2:08 pm
See In re Griffin, No. 16-12012, __ F.3d __, 2016 WL 3002293 (11th Cir. [read post]
22 Oct 2023, 6:44 am
Between Griffin and Billups, I'd take Griffin. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 7:24 pm
Griffin can never attempt the Ohio bar again. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 4:24 pm
There were a number of people, of course, who thought ‘oh, no, you’re going too far, you’re going to be set back. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 4:17 am
” They’re not. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 9:46 pm
“Bloom where you’re planted. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 7:59 pm
If you didn't watch VH-1 Divas, catch it on the re-run. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
In this post, I’ll discuss the first of the CRSCC’s off-ramp arguments, which invokes Chief Justice Chase’s opinion in In re Griffin, 11 F. [read post]
23 Apr 2022, 1:04 pm
In a recent post, I explained that the holding of In Re Griffin, a leading case on Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment, cannot be properly understood without recognizing that Virginia was an unreconstructed state when the decision was made. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 3:46 am
Griffin the 5th District decided that Baker gave Sandra Griffin a get-out-of-jail card. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:58 am
In my original Section Three article and in this report, I contend that Chief Justice Chase’s interpretation of Section Three in his circuit opinion in In Re Griffin was inconsistent with his conclusion about Section Three in the pre-trial proceedings for Jefferson Davis’s treason trial. [read post]
27 May 2022, 5:05 am
In Footnote 16, he states that In Re Griffin, a Section Three case decided on circuit by Chief Justice Chase in 1869, is "too... [read post]
