Search for: "In re Griffin"
Results 101 - 120
of 719
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2023, 2:55 pm
Griffin (W.D. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
.'"A couple of weeks ago, my co-blogger Professor Eric Segall questioned what he deemed the pervasively originalist methodology of Professors Baude and Paulsen, noting, among other things, that, in the very year that the Fourteenth Amendment was ratified, Chief Justice Salmon Chase ruled that Section 3 is not self-executing in a case that has come to be known as In Re Griffin. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 10:36 am
The case citation is In re Charge to Grand Jury, 62 F. 828 (N.D. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 3:00 am
—Blake Griffin 1 Fisch v. [read post]
Of Insurrections, Presidents, and the Utter Failure of Constitutional Law to Address the Real Issues
14 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
This case, In Re Griffin, according to the authors, "continues to cast a shadow over Section 3 today. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 3:00 am
Michael Stokes Paulsen and I have a new draft article: The Sweep and Force of Section Three, that is forthcoming in the Pennsylvania Law Review. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 8:07 pm
Here in Oregon, we're big on ballot measures. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 3:52 am
We’re going to give that to the next guy. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 10:15 pm
We're going to give that to the next guy. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 7:34 am
The firm’s lengthy client roster includes hedge fund giant Citadel, whose founder Ken Griffin donated $1 million to Suarez’s state campaign earlier this year. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
Now They’re Scrambling. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 5:48 am
Will see the weaponization of options—everything we’re doing is put through a partisan filter, and the longer we’re in denial about that the worse things will ultimately get. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 2:11 am
Rachel Griffin: Analyzing meaning in context is getting better—so will people start saying it’s ok to leave it to the machine? [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 6:19 am
(And if you think climate change is likely to make such days more common, you’re right. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 12:37 pm
In this case, we learned through our investigation that the customer did not act inappropriately, and we're working directly with the customer to resolve their concerns while also looking at ways to prevent a similar situation from happening again. [read post]
8 May 2023, 12:49 pm
Without further ado, our next winner is Jesse Griffin! [read post]
2 May 2023, 9:01 pm
Have you ever wondered how six conservative Catholic Supreme Court Justices were able to be on the Supreme Court at the same time? [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 7:03 am
If you’re facing a possible FCA violation with the DOJ, contact a Georgia False Claims Act attorney at our firm today. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 12:18 pm
The May Giveaway With our first contributor giveaway a success, we’re doing it again. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:58 am
In my original Section Three article and in this report, I contend that Chief Justice Chase’s interpretation of Section Three in his circuit opinion in In Re Griffin was inconsistent with his conclusion about Section Three in the pre-trial proceedings for Jefferson Davis’s treason trial. [read post]
