Search for: "In re HIPAA Subpoena" Results 1 - 14 of 14
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2009, 11:08 pm
"Because [the subpoenaed doctors] did not provide physician services to plaintiffs, they are not covered entities under HIPAA and, therefore, HIPAA does not prevent enforcement of the subpoenas. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 9:26 am
  Well, we’re cheering again, and we like that better.Last Friday the Eleventh Circuit decided Murphy v. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 12:25 am
§1320d-2; In re Diet Drug Litigation, 895 A.2d 493, 497 n.11 (N.J. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 1:56 am
Minkowitz RICHMOND COUNTYCriminal PracticeMTV Granted Motion to Quash District Attorney's Subpoena; Qualified Privilege Asserted, Not Overcome People v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 11:52 am by Beck, et al.
That's why the recent In re Ortho Evra Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 1742 (N.D. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 8:00 am by Beck, et al.
In one of these, In re Nuvaring Products Liability Litigation, 2009 WL 775442, at *2 (E.D. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 5:58 am
  It was passed as part of HIPAA amendments in 2005 to create reporting systems for medical errors, so that such errors could be analyzed and the analysis used to prevent future medical errors. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 10:17 am by Jason C. Gavejian
  By way of example, the Connecticut Supreme Court held that HIPAA did not preempt a negligence claim in connection with the healthcare provider’s disclosure of patient information in response to a subpoena. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 9:10 am by Alex Loomis
United States, a D.C. circuit case from 1950 noting that a court that lacked the power to subpoena witnesses would present constitutional difficulties. [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 5:03 pm by Gina Bongiovi
  Despite all the protestations, doing so is NOT a HIPAA violation. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 9:51 am by Al Saikali
  Would “both sides of the story” need to be maintained, as is the case with HIPAA’s right to amend? [read post]