Search for: "In re Habeas Corpus of Factor"
Results 81 - 100
of 189
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2010, 9:14 pm
In re Bruce Webster, 2010 U.S. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:13 pm
The en banc First Circuit, with Judges Torruella and Thompson dissenting, blessed the feds’ use of a writ of habeas corpus ad prosequendum, which in non-Little Lord Fauntleroy terms is a writ to produce the prisoner so he can be prosecuted. [read post]
29 Aug 2010, 7:04 pm
LEXIS 8294 (Cal 8/26/2010) In re Richardson, 2010 Cal. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 5:53 am
When Congress decided to screw with habeas corpus by enacting the AEDPA, it was in a law about terrorists. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 5:49 am
Foster sought a writ of habeas corpus from a Georgia Superior Court. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 5:49 am
Foster sought a writ of habeas corpus from a Georgia Superior Court. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:34 am
McBride, No. 06-7550 Denial of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus is affirmed in part where petitioner was not denied the effective assistance of counsel, but vacated where the state circuit court contravened his Sixth Amendment confrontation right by applying a per se rule restricting cross-examination of the prosecution's expert under a rape shield law. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:09 am
As his execution date approached, Davis filed a habeas corpus petition directly with the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals presenting a claim of actual innocence not tied to any other constitutional violation. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 10:13 am
On June 25, 2013, Malvo filed two petitions for a writ of habeas corpus in federal court, arguing that the life sentences he received in Virginia violated the Eighth Amendment in light of the Supreme Court’s then-recent decision in Miller. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 4:37 pm
On September 27, 1977 the Law Guardian commenced a habeas corpus proceeding in the Supreme Court. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 9:15 am
.): This post has been modified to include petitions that have been re-listed for the Conference of October 29. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 6:46 pm
Alexander, No. 071780 Following indictment against petitioner for criminal sale of a controlled substance in or near school grounds, denial of writ of habeas corpus is affirmed where: 1) the state courts reasonably determined that petitioner had not made out a prima facie case; and 2) petitioner's post-conviction detention was not unlawful. . [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 12:01 pm
Tomko , No. 05-4997 Sentence for tax evasion is confirmed where: 1) the the district court did not commit procedural error at sentencing, as the record shows the district court did not fail to meaningfully consider the 18 U.S.C. sec. 3553(a) factor of general deterrence; and 2) the court did not abuse its discretion in sentencing defendant, as the court conducted a thorough analysis of the sec. 3553(a) factors and gave logical reasons for the variance from the sentencing guidelines… [read post]
22 Jan 2022, 8:46 am
Understandably frustrated, he filed a habeas corpus petition. [read post]
22 May 2011, 4:34 am
AIR 1981 Raj. 211, and in re: Dr. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 11:20 am
§ 2254(d) and this Court’s precedent permit federal habeas corpus relief on a claim that a state judge unconstitutionally “coerces” jurors to return a guilty verdict by identifying specific evidence in the case as important and instructing them to consider it? [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 5:20 am
Plaintiff filed a petition for federal habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 9:22 am
Courtesy of Law Offices of Dena Alo-Colbeck “Writing and Research for Washington Attorneys” Washington State Law Washington State Supreme Court Detention of D.F.F.: The Court held that the Superior Court Mental Proceeding Rule 1.3, which provides involuntary commitment proceedings “shall not be open to the public, unless the person who is the subject of the proceedings or his attorney files with the court a written request that the proceedings be public,” violates the right… [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 4:00 am
As I noted in a blog post accompanying the April column, there would be potentially serious procedural obstacles to Trump's obtaining his release via habeas corpus in that circumstances, although it is hard to know how that would all play out.Even so, while the criminal charges against Trump weaken his general election prospects and lead to uncertainty about how he would serve if he nonetheless won the Presidency, they do not appear to reduce the likelihood that he will secure… [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 9:49 pm
Martin Docket: 09-996 Issue: Whether, in federal habeas corpus proceedings, a state law under which a prisoner may be barred from collaterally attacking his conviction when the prisoner “substantially delayed” filing his habeas petition is “inadequate” to support a procedural bar because (1) the federal court believes that the rule is vague and (2) the state failed to prove that its courts… [read post]