Search for: "In re Harmon"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,178
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jan 2010, 6:34 am
As mentioned, this list of questions is not definitive, but points to the scope of matters to be considered in preparing for harmonization. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 9:26 am
I am a big proponent of the harmonization of international standards. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 6:56 pm
RAC also agreed to add specific concentration limits of C >1 % for STOT RE 1 and 0.1 > C < 1 % for STOT RE 2. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 9:56 pm
The case, of course, raising these issues anew is In re Kubin, decided on Friday. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 2:02 pm
Finally, after re-reading the Regulatory Impact Statement regarding the anti-avoidance provisions, businesses that have expanded into another province after March 26, 2009 may find their business activities under a CRA microscope and will have to prove their legitimate business purpose to an auditor: The Regulations also set out rules to prevent persons from improperly taking advantage of a change in the new harmonized value-added tax system under the Excise Tax Act. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 12:00 pm
While "harmonization" might protect some, it surely will harm others as more migrant-friendly countries may be encouraged to change their laws to conform to EU standards. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 2:03 am
To help – we’re posting memos about COVID-19 implications in our “Risk Management” Practice Area. [read post]
1 Nov 2006, 4:20 pm
Angie Harmon, Felicity Huffman and... [read post]
15 Dec 2007, 11:24 am
SCRIPT-ed is the (newly re-subtitled) journal of law, technology and society edited at the AHRC Research Centre for Studies in Intellectual Property and Technology Law in Edinburgh. [read post]
31 Mar 2007, 12:06 pm
Would you like to know more about ERISA, but you're afraid to ask? [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 1:16 am
Now that we're on top, the argument goes, we're all about protection of IP by law. [read post]
10 Nov 2018, 4:00 pm
Graham Butler, In Search of the Political Question Doctrine in EU LawMbakiso Magwape, The AfCFTA and Trade Facilitation: Re-Arranging Continental Economic Integration Marco Inglese, The Collaborative Economy Legal Conundrum: A Way Forward Through Harmonization Lilian Meinen, A ‘Frictionless’ Border for Gibraltar: Stumbling Blocks and Solutions Following BrexitYannis Schlüter, Towards a Court Mandated Harmonization of National Tax Rules Case 552/15,… [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 1:56 am
Section 6 Inter partes review Amends 35 USC § 311 to replace inter partes re-examination with “inter partes review” allowing third party to challenge validity or scope of an issued patent only on a ground that is permissible under 35 USC § 102 and 103. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 7:47 am
What will drive harmonization? [read post]
25 May 2011, 12:39 pm
Most recently, Director Kappos has re-initiated discussions on substantive patent harmonization, talks which were begun over 25 years ago but which have languished over the past few years. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 5:59 am
Kernodle, Harmonizing Internal Whistleblower Complaints with ERISA Employee Protections: A Review of... [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 6:22 am
Here's the abstract:This paper undertakes a re-examination of the Court’s practice in intervention. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 4:30 am
SIDE BAR: Okay, let’s just stop here for a second and make sure that we’re all on the same page here. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 1:56 am
Section 6 Inter partes review Amends 35 USC § 311 to replace inter partes re-examination with “inter partes review” allowing third party to challenge validity or scope of an issued patent only on a ground that is permissible under 35 USC § 102 and 103. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 10:26 am
Stations powered at 5 kW or more are required to suppress harmonics by 80 dB. [read post]
