Search for: "In re Hawkins, Petitioner"
Results 1 - 20
of 30
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2023, 6:00 am
Hawkins did not recall respondent yelling during the meeting. [read post]
18 May 2023, 6:00 am
Hawkins did not recall respondent yelling during the meeting. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 3:15 pm
Good morning, General Hawkins. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 5:20 am
"At oral argument, Hawkins (wisely) abandoned that argument. [read post]
31 Oct 2020, 7:39 am
If it’s not your divorce and you’re married to someone else, that alimony should have been cancelled by the new marriage. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 10:45 am
"That was Judges Nguyen, Hawkins and Tashima. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 11:10 am
Kyle Hawkins is the solicitor general of Texas. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 4:31 pm
They’re exempt? [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 10:18 am
The rehearing petition in Hawkins v. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 12:00 pm
Also returning for a fifth time is the petition for rehearing in Hawkins v. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 9:32 am
Also on its fourth relist is the petition for rehearing in Hawkins v. [read post]
27 May 2016, 8:00 am
Rounding out this week’s old business is Hawkins v. [read post]
20 May 2016, 9:08 am
Hawkins v. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 7:34 am
Rueda argues that because the unsigned opinion of Judge Davidson was his first decision, he could not re-determine the merits in a subsequently signed decision. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 6:21 am
The Chief Justice, for example, commented to Brian Fletcher (arguing for the government) that, “if you were in the industry and you’re looking at this, you wouldn’t call the petitioner an applicant. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:00 pm
§ 2255 petition where a petitioner relies to his detriment on binding circuit precedent that would have rendered his claim futile. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 2:56 pm
Both this week’s winners of golden tickets are one-time relists: Hawkins v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 1:52 pm
“Second, the petitioner must satisfy ‘theburden of showing that his right to issuance of the writ isclear and indisputable. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 11:39 pm
Or if you’re teaching an advanced criminal law class, you might want to have your students buy chapter 8, which covers the modern criminal law of gun control, particularly under the federal Gun Control Act.Summary of Contents ContentsPrefaceAcknowledgementsEditorial Note PART ONETHE ORIGINS OF THE RIGHT TO ARMS Chapter 1. [read post]
