Search for: "In re Herrera" Results 1 - 20 of 158
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Feb 2024, 8:00 am by Yosi Yahoudai
I think that we’re doing a decent job by just doing what Reilly and I think is cool in hopes that if we think it’s dope, I think other people are going to as well. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 9:22 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Civil rights law in the US is completely dead unless you’re not brown or poor. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 2:41 pm by Jack Bogdanski
I wonder what they're doing – a post for another day. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 11:52 am by Neal Davis
They include: Domestic assault Aggravated domestic assault Domestic assault impeding breath Continuous violence against the family, which includes a family member by marriage, blood or adoption or a household member (such as a roommate or someone who is a former or current dating partner of the alleged offender) Alternatives to Jail, Prison for Domestic Violence in Texas If you’re convicted of domestic violence, you may have options when it comes to sentencing. [read post]
25 Mar 2023, 9:28 am by Kalvis Golde
A list of all petitions we’re watching is available here. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 12:42 pm by Jack Bogdanski
Had they nominated the incumbent, Jaime Herrera Beutler, the Republicans would have returned her to Congress easily. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 5:53 pm by Jack Bogdanski
It's gotten more interesting in that Congressional primary we're watching up in Clark County, Washington and surroundings. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 4:33 am by Jack Bogdanski
If you're like me, you don't want any more Trump cult members in Congress. [read post]
14 Jul 2022, 3:34 am by Jack Bogdanski
If they're right, despite the careful gerrymander by the Democrats, the GOP will in fact pick up the add-on seat in Oregon.In the 'Couve, they have Herrera Beutler as the prohibitive favorite, but of course, over there they haven't even had their primary yet. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 4:30 am by Eric Segall
 The majority in Herrera ruled that, absent a constitutionally flawed trial, a capital defendant could not seek to re-open the trial with new evidence ten years after the initial trial. [read post]