Search for: "In re Hodari D"
Results 1 - 9
of 9
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2020, 4:00 pm
So, at this point, we –we take Justice Scalia's opinion in Hodari D. at its word, and –and we're not asking the Court to revisit the original meaning of a seizure under the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 11:10 am
The present case is materially indistinguishable from Hodari D. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 12:08 pm
” For Breyer, the line the court drew in Hodari D. is “as good a line as any. [read post]
26 Mar 2021, 1:31 am
Hodari D., 499 U.S. 621 (1991), about whether there was a different approach for applications of physical force to a person. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 9:16 am
Hodari D., 499 U.S. 621, 628 (1991). [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 12:06 pm
DiBiase, 2012 WL 5868154 (D. [read post]
13 Sep 2020, 8:38 am
” Left: Hodari, John Nolley, and Hadiya. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 6:17 pm
Oquendo – declining to adopt the restricted meaning of seizure under Hodari D. and holding that Connecticut’s Constitution provides greater protection. 6. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 11:07 pm
The court concluded: “[D]efendant has not shown that he, as the passenger, was the subject of the deputy's show of authority or that he actually submitted to it. [read post]
