Search for: "In re Holt" Results 141 - 160 of 309
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2022, 5:30 am by Susan Taylor
Though initially denied by Judge Holt in the District Court for the Southern District of New York, in 1914, the owners successfully petitioned the U.S. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 1:10 pm by Michael
Clearly they’re banking on the maxim that all publicity is good publicity will hold true. [read post]
11 Dec 2006, 8:15 pm
  Matthew Holt, who puts out The Health Care Blog, commented on that Health Affairs Blog post and seems unwilling to trust the health care - financial services cabal to do the right thing. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 1:07 am by Laura Sandwell
Holt v Her Majesty’s Attorney General on behalf of the Queen, heard 15 – 16 January 2014. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 1:04 am
The suit alleges a conflict of interest and claims that before and during her Feb. 17 meeting with SEC investigators, Pendergest-Holt believed that Sjoblom was acting as her attorney. [read post]
3 Mar 2018, 5:57 pm by Lisa Ouellette
Ouellette (@PatentScholar) March 3, 2018Ryan Holte & @tedsichelman: descriptive data on obviousness decisions in dist. ct. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 10:13 am by David Post
" If you're not familiar with scorched-earth litigation tactics and the Art of Threatening a Lawsuit (of which Mr. [read post]
3 Mar 2018, 5:57 pm by Lisa Ouellette
Ouellette (@PatentScholar) March 3, 2018Ryan Holte & @tedsichelman: descriptive data on obviousness decisions in dist. ct. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 2:59 am
 We're glad to see that mandatory labeling, in addition to standards for care -- this is a very good step forward. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 1:08 pm by Shafik Bhalloo
INTRODUCTION The steps to receiving a suspension when appealing a determination of the Director of Employment Standards (the “Director”) to the Employment Standards Tribunal (the “Tribunal”) can be confusing and full of potholes, so it is best to plan ahead and know the terrain. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 3:19 am
  We’re all &^$*#@’d come January 20th! [read post]
7 Feb 2015, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
JR 38, Re Judicial Review, heard 6 November 2014. [read post]