Search for: "In re Hubbell"
Results 1 - 20
of 432
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2013, 11:58 pm
The "Hubbell" in In re Hubbell is Jeffrey Hubbell, who was a Professor of ChemicalEngineering at California Institute of Technology, who is a named inventor on U.S. [read post]
13 Feb 2006, 7:01 am
If you're starting out with a Maryland statute or point of law and are trying to locate a similar statute in another jurisdiction, think about using the Martindale-Hubbell's Law Digest. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 4:13 am
And they're not cheap. [read post]
14 May 2008, 4:25 pm
Question: What is the Martindale-Hubbell attorney directory that I hear so much about? [read post]
20 Nov 2006, 4:42 pm
They're not calling them super lawyers yet, but LexisNexis Martindale-Hubbell is now sending out press releases announcing lawyers have been rated. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 10:45 am
The Patent Office countered that: (1) whether the application and patent were ever commonly owned is immaterial to the policy of preventing harassment by multiple assignees; (2) identity of inventorship is not required where there is an overlap in inventors; (3) Hubbell did not establish any grounds for being allowed to file a terminal disclaimer; and (4) two-way obviousness analysis is not required because Hubbell admitted that he partially is responsible for the delay that caused… [read post]
3 Aug 2008, 7:12 am
*Martindale-Hubbell is no joke. [read post]
15 May 2009, 9:24 am
*Martindale-Hubbell is no joke. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 8:02 pm
Believe it or not I'm not trying to pick on Martindale-Hubbell. [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 3:59 pm
They're doing a nice job of it using PR methods of days gone by with expensive PR agencies monitoring net discussion, framing PR responses for the company, and dabbling on the side with a few bloggers. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 3:57 pm
Highlights from the Passarella article include: An informal survey of Philadelphia firms by Delaware Valley Law Firm Marketing Group founder Stacy West Clark found more firms than not saying they were either eliminating or scaling back their use of Martindale-Hubbell's listing services.Although firms realize general counsel may be using Martindale-Hubbell to find outside counsel, cost-benefit analyses just aren't convincing marketers at some of the area's largest… [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 3:57 pm
Highlights from the Passarella article include: An informal survey of Philadelphia firms by Delaware Valley Law Firm Marketing Group founder Stacy West Clark found more firms than not saying they were either eliminating or scaling back their use of Martindale-Hubbell's listing services.Although firms realize general counsel may be using Martindale-Hubbell to find outside counsel, cost-benefit analyses just aren't convincing marketers at some of the area's largest… [read post]
12 Apr 2009, 5:14 pm
Barrett on Martindale-Hubbell ConnectedConnect with David A. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 9:35 am
Please re-number footnote 1 on page 7, line 28, as footnote2. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 9:59 pm
*Martindale-Hubbell is no joke. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 2:11 pm
"We're putting resources to bear that only an established company can know to produce," he says. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 8:06 pm
If you don't know what you're doing, get some help. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 7:05 pm
Law Digests would not be updated after 2010, and it looks they’re sticking to their word. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 12:57 pm
We're looking at all sorts of new things. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 10:43 am
Let's just say that I think it's a really, really, REALLY bad idea to start everyone off as an AV 5.0 and (potentially) re-review them DOWN over a 10-year period (according to Martindale-Hubbell's Transformation Timetable). [read post]
