Search for: "In re INITIATIVE PETITION NO. 23 STATE QUESTION NO. 38" Results 21 - 36 of 36
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2012, 11:23 pm by Paul Karlsgodt
The first legislative enactment occurred with the 1934 Constitution, which provided, in art. 113, no. 38, the popular action. [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 8:21 pm by Ken
We’re the good guys; they are the bad guys. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 8:34 pm by Bill Marler
In a memo to FDA, the committee states: “the sixty-day aging process for hard cheese is questionable as an effective measure in support of the public’s health. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 6:01 pm by Bill Marler
In a memo to FDA, the committee states: “the sixty-day aging process for hard cheese is questionable as an effective measure in support of the public’s health. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 6:25 am
Upon review, the Tenth Circuit denied Sorenson's petition for review because the Commission’s order was consistent with its statutory mandate and was not arbitrary or capricious. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 2:57 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In re Lehman Brothers Securities & ERISA Litigation, 655 F. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 4:56 pm
Finally, some have approached the federalism question directly and urge repeal of McCarran and substitution of federal, not state, regulation of the insurance industry and ultimate pre-emption of federal antitrust laws in deference of a national regulatory scheme.Secondly, Congressional hearings have contributed to the debate. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 4:43 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  The company petitioned the Supreme Court to resolve the split. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 6:50 am by Barry Sookman
In SOCAN v CAIP [2004] 2 SCR 427 the Supreme Court applied the real and substantial connection test to hold that the Copyright Act right of communication to the public can be infringed if there is a sufficient connection between this country and the communication in question. [read post]