Search for: "In re INITIATIVE STATE QUESTION NO. 10." Results 261 - 280 of 4,406
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2012, 10:55 am
Why the Case is Interesting: The Fifth Circuit declined to follow certain lower court opinions, like the decision in In re Reyes, Case No. 10-52366-C, 2011 WL 1522337, at *6 (Bankr. [read post]
4 Oct 2012, 1:29 pm by Ken Chan
Consider the dissent from In re Troy Anthony Davis, 557 U.S. ___ (2009), in which Justice Scalia stated: This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is “actually” innocent. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 5:00 am
Question #10 – Employment Authorization When should I file for an extension of my employment authorization? [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 10:52 am
Whilst there are countless developments worthy of note, some of the key questions include:How does one become Person/Thing in the first place? [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
EPC 2000)[3] As the application under consideration was filed on December 2, 2003, the question arises as to which provisions have to be applied after the entry into force of the EPC 2000. [read post]
According to the latest edition of Seyfarth’s 50 State Desktop Reference: What Businesses Need to Know about Non-Competes and Trade Secrets Law, 28 states permit enforcement of non-competes against discharged employees, three likely would do so, nine would not, and in 10 states the issue is unresolved. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 8:25 pm by Greg Lambert
As a newer legal tech company, Trellis initially had to overcome skepticism and get large firms to try their product. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 11:23 am by corynne
The court initially demanded disclosure within just 5 days, so 10 days is an improvement. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 5:00 am by Elaine Nolen
A January 2015 press release described the technology as superior tracking that “works no matter what you’re doing. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 10:31 am by Joel R. Brandes
The Sixth Circuit held that reversal and remand was required because the proper remedy for the initial kidnapping to Ecuador was a Hague Convention petition filed in Ecuador, subject to applicable limitations and defenses, rather than the self-help remedy of (in effect) later re-kidnapping back to the United States. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 12:39 am by William Carleton
" (Justice Kennedy, writing for the Court, page 10 of the slip opinion.) [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 7:31 am by Andy Gillin
After initially denying the charges, Arnold Friedman pleaded guilty to sodomy and sexual abuse. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
As a result it seemed initially that he was not aware of this generally known problem. [read post]
6 Apr 2008, 11:11 am
It is not clear that any ultimate, Church-initiated pre-enforcement litigation will look that different, in terms of adversariness or concreteness, than the state-initiated action sought by the original law. [read post]