Search for: "In re INITIATIVE STATE QUESTION NO. 10."
Results 341 - 360
of 3,976
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2011, 11:49 am
More on eyewitness ID from the states will be in the next post. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 2:22 pm
This Part 10 closes the Symposium series. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 2:11 pm
Compare these numbers with what existed in 2007, a “normal” economic year when initial claims and weekly certifications were around 10 questions each and could be filed via a phone call. [read post]
30 May 2013, 5:01 pm
Initially an annotation was entered into the system to the effect that no action should be taken in the absence of instructions from Mr Z. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 5:52 am
Mar. 10, 2008), decision available here. [read post]
5 Feb 2025, 6:43 am
Energy products from Canada will be subject to a 10 percent levy. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 1:26 pm
For instance, you may have only 10 days after the judgement is entered to ask the court to re-open the record to get new evidence entered not initially addressed at trial. [read post]
8 Apr 2023, 7:09 pm
That remains an open question. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 10:00 pm
“We’ve had cases who stressed they definitely didn’t have ahi poke, so we’re in the hypothesis-generating stage of trying to look at the cases in 10 different ways. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 9:42 am
The question then becomes what would we do? [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 6:01 pm
On the other hand, on the question of time limits connected with the initiation of the legal process, the EBA pointed out that, in the course of the preparatory work on the EPC, a majority of the Working Party which had looked into the scope of re-establishment of rights had considered that re-establishment should not apply to the opponent because he had other means of availing himself of his rights, in particular by bringing an action for revocation before the… [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 10:26 am
The department credits its initiatives and the work of states passing distracted driving laws. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 10:47 am
By now, you’ve probably heard about the foreclosure crisis; namely, about all the questionable paperwork and procedures banks have been using to initiate foreclosures. [read post]
10 Jun 2007, 4:18 pm
At the selectmen’s May 10 meeting, Democratic Selectman Gordon Frassinelli questioned the utility and deterrent value of the ban, likening the initial written warning and $100 fine on the second offense to an unshoveled sidewalk violation. [read post]
22 Sep 2004, 10:41 am
The initial answer provided by Howard O. [read post]
12 Nov 2024, 1:46 pm
Only half of the states even allow citizen-initiated ballot measures. [read post]
1 Nov 2024, 3:00 am
GOP Focus on Rare Noncitizen Voting May Continue Long After Election Day MSN – Patrick Marley (Washington Post) | Published: 10/26/2024 Eight states, including the swing state of North Carolina, are taking up ballot measures also that would toughen bans on noncitizen voting, part of a broad and concerted Republican effort to stoke fears that hordes of noncitizens will illegally vote for Kamala Harris and deprive Donald Trump of a return to the White House. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
A case must be removed to the federal district court that encompasses the state court where the action was initiated. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 6:00 am
(Under the Los Angeles ordinance, new requirements arise when the applicant provides any additional information upon receipt of the employer’s first notice and its initial completed assessment: the employer receiving that additional information must then complete a re-assessment and provide the applicant with a copy of it while notifying the applicant of the final decision.) [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 6:00 am
(Under the Los Angeles ordinance, new requirements arise when the applicant provides any additional information upon receipt of the employer’s first notice and its initial completed assessment: the employer receiving that additional information must then complete a re-assessment and provide the applicant with a copy of it while notifying the applicant of the final decision.) [read post]
