Search for: "In re INITIATIVE STATE QUESTION NO. 10." Results 61 - 80 of 4,382
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2024, 12:05 am by Josh Richman
   How one state's 2008 law has effectively curbed how face recognition technology is used there, perhaps creating a model for other states or Congress to follow. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 1:15 pm by Guest Author
If you can’t set aside the rule and you’re not a regulated party, how is their injury redressable in this suit and why do they have standing? [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
To reduce litigants to "Does" and initials risks making of them stick figures and algebraic symbols. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 7:37 am by Amy Howe
In her complaint, she contended that she was the only person charged under the state law in the past 10 years for temporarily misplacing a document. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 9:46 am by Kalvis Golde
Once King’s case proceeded to trial, initial questioning of potential jurors by both the prosecution and defense whittled down the pool to 42 candidates, eight of whom were Black. [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 6:18 pm
The U.S. analog came at the end of the prior century.[8] Text first, and where text is not clear or complete—then the spirit of the law must be exhumed from the evidence left by those responsible for the constitution and enactment of text as law.[9]   And yet, the doctrine produces a tension—one that produces interpretive pluralism in the face of clarity and completeness determined by heterogeneous courts.[10]  The tension remains between a core premise embracing… [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 10:07 am by admin
Of course, this is why the lawsuit industry loves IARC evaluations, with its fallacies of semantical distortion.[5] Although identifying the causes of a jury verdict is more difficult than even determining carcinogenicity, Rosemary Pinto, one of plaintiff Kline’s lawyers, suggested that the exclusion of the IARC evaluation sank her case: “We’re very disappointed in the jury verdict, which we plan to appeal, based upon adverse rulings in advance of the trial that really… [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 6:56 am by centerforartlaw
This iterative process continued in countries like India and China, each factory adding its own interpretation and modifications along the way.[17] Wiesner stated, “One thing we’re always so amazed by is the creativity that comes out of the half of the process when producing an object [in a factory]. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 4:07 pm by Lundgren & Johnson, PSC
  Often times, a person is booked at the time of their initial arrest. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 1:50 pm by Ben Luftman
Your Right to Remain Silent You’re not required to answer potentially incriminating questions about your activities or alcohol consumption. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 10:47 am by Jeffrey Randa
In our work as Michigan DUI lawyers, we answer a lot of questions about this. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
The justices warned of chaos if a candidate for nationwide office could be declared ineligible in some states, but not others, based on the same conduct. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Northway, when it stated that “the question of materiality, it is universally agreed, is an objective one, involving the significance of an omitted or misrepresented fact to a reasonable investor. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:13 am by Marty Lederman
”  Perhaps, then, those arguments will be re-consigned to the obscure corners of implausible scholarship from whence they came. [read post]