Search for: "In re Interest of C.W" Results 1 - 16 of 16
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2012, 4:13 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
From the court’s syllabus: To the extent that In re Interest of C.W. et al., 239 Neb. 817, 479 N.W.2d 105 (1992), permits a state court to consider the best interests of an Indian child in deciding whether there is good cause to deny a motion to transfer a proceeding to tribal court, it is overruled. [read post]
17 Dec 2012, 4:13 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
From the court’s syllabus: To the extent that In re Interest of C.W. et al., 239 Neb. 817, 479 N.W.2d 105 (1992), permits a state court to consider the best interests of an Indian child in deciding whether there is good cause to deny a motion to transfer a proceeding to tribal court, it is overruled. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 6:32 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Elise M., 825 N.W.2d 173, 184-86 (Neb. 2012) (overruling its decision to allow a “best interests” consideration in In re Interest of C.W., 479 N.W.2d 105 (Neb. 1992)); In re Guardianship of Ashley Elizabeth R., 863 P.2d 451, 456 (N.M. [read post]
11 Mar 2007, 6:00 am
C.W. was a father, a husband, a son, a friend and my hero. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 3:15 pm by Michael W. Huseman
In Re F.W. and C.W., Minors, 261 Ill.App.3d 894 (4th Dist. 1994).They're infringing upon my client's constitutional rights!!! [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 6:28 am
Conflicts of interest in this context usually arise in cases involving joint representation, but a conflict may also arise `when a client's interest conflicts with that of his attorney. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 8:24 am by Don Cruse
In re B.G., C.W., E.W., B.B.W., and J.W., Children, No. 07-0960 (docket and briefs). [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 5:02 am by SHG
“Legally, they’re right. [read post]
19 Jul 2014, 9:09 pm by Dan Flynn
Right before DCSD took the exit, a local school board removed the C.W. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 1:00 pm by Steve Lubet
Davis, PhD Professor of Biochemistry and Genetics Stanford University Stanford, California Jonathan C.W. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:08 pm by The Legal Blog
Justice KG BalakrishnanThe Supreme Court in Selvi & Ors. v State of Karnataka has examined the law relating to the involuntary administration of certain scientific techniques, namely narcoanalysis, polygraph examination and the Brain Electrical Activation Profile (BEAP) test for the purpose of improving investigation efforts in criminal cases. [read post]