Search for: "In re Joseph F. (2000)" Results 1 - 20 of 103
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jan 2013, 12:45 pm by Tom Lamb
MERCK & CO., INC., Defendant, Civil Action No.: 1:08-cv-4119, is scheduled to start on January 14, 2013 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York ("SDNY") United States District Court Judge Joseph F. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:04 am by Schachtman
Supp. 247 (1984), rev’d on other grounds, 816 F.2d 1417 (10th Cir. 1987) In re TMI Litig., 193 F.3d 613, 629 (3d Cir. 1999)(rejecting “doubling dose” trial court’s analysis), amended, 199 F.3d 158 (3d Cir. 2000) In re Hanford Nuclear Reservation Litig., 1998 WL 775340, at *8 (E.D.Wash. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 10:04 am by Schachtman
CONFOUNDING1 Back in 2000, several law professors wrote an essay, in which they detailed some of the problems courts experienced in expert witness gatekeeping. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am by Beck, et al.
Nov. 29, 1993); In re Verifone Securities Litigation, 784 F. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 6:29 am by Jacques Singer-Emery
Circuit’s decision In re Kempthorne, 449 F.3d 1265 (D.C. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 1:09 pm by Schachtman
” David Faigman, David Kaye, Michael Saks, Joseph Sanders, “How Good is Good Enough? [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 4:40 pm by Schachtman
Green & Joseph Sanders, “Admissibility Versus Sufficiency: Controlling the Quality of Expert Witness Testimony in the United States,” . [read post]
8 Sep 2024, 6:37 pm by centerforartlaw
By Joseph Scapellato Holocaust survivors and their heirs face substantial challenges in suits to recover Nazi-looted art in U.S. courts. [read post]
1 Dec 2019, 7:52 pm by Nikki Siesel
Cir. 2017) (quoting In re Coors Brewing Co.,343 F.3d 1340, 68 USPQ2d 1059, 1063 (Fed. [read post]