Search for: "In re Julius B." Results 1 - 20 of 36
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Mar 2011, 2:00 am by Keith Paul Bishop
If you’re reading this blog, then you had a better Ides of March than Julius Caesar did in 44 B.C.E. [read post]
2 Mar 2008, 10:40 am
” Exhibit B: Cher responds to her critics while receiving a Billboard Music Award: “So f— ‘em. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 1:32 pm by Buce
  Not this crowd; they're just punching in on the clock. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 1:19 pm by Stephen Gottlieb
[i] William Shakepeare, Julius Caesar, Act I, scene ii, lines 146-147. [read post]
8 Feb 2014, 7:16 am by Gene Killian
If you’re of a certain age, this should remind you of a series of Peter Sellers films. [read post]
27 May 2011, 7:32 am by Dan Markel
For those of you attending LSA next week,  or if you're in SF nonetheless, please note that below the fold is information regarding the 10 panels making up the "crimprof" shadow conference. [read post]
24 May 2019, 11:33 am by David Greene
If a journalist, like then-candidate Trump, had said: "Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the [classified] emails that are missing. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 4:07 pm by Kluwer Patent blogger
” 3) CJEU finds reputation is irrelevant in the assessment of similarity of two signs by Julius Stobbs “The Court of Justice has said that reputation and enhanced distinctive character are not relevant to the assessment of similarity of the signs under Article 8(1)(b) of the Regulation and should only be considered in the assessment of likelihood of confusion. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 5:30 am by Duets Guest Blogger
The banner with the word Super Bowl on it conjures up images of a Roman Feast, Julius Caesar style. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 6:28 am by Kluwer Patent Blog
” 3) CJEU finds reputation is irrelevant in the assessment of similarity of two signs by Julius Stobbs “The Court of Justice has said that reputation and enhanced distinctive character are not relevant to the assessment of similarity of the signs under Article 8(1)(b) of the Regulation and should only be considered in the assessment of likelihood of confusion. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 10:54 am by Julius Stobbs
Of particular note, the resulting right is to arise without any re-examination. [read post]