Search for: "In re L.D." Results 1 - 20 of 41
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2016, 8:46 am by Mark Ashton
 It should never be an invitation to “re-try” a different case employing different facts or theories. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 7:57 am by Kate Fort
In re L.D., ¶ 14 (internal citation omitted). [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 7:49 am by Andrew Delaney
Plaintiff filed a complaint against L.D. because, according to her, she was staying over at her friend’s house and L.D. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 3:37 am by SHG
An interesting debate appeared at Arc Digital between L.D. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 7:16 am by Sandy T. Fox
You only have a set number of days (or months or years) to take certain actions, and if you’re late, then you face serious consequences. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 4:00 am
They're not necessarily eating the food for a physiological reason, but they're doing it for a psychological reason. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 3:06 pm by Phillips & Associates
According to the shopper’s complaint, the woman who sent the email, L.D., didn’t actually have the authority to fire her but, after the shopper missed several shifts in mid-May (because L.D. instructed her not to show up for work,) the employer fired her for unexcused absences. [read post]