Search for: "In re M.P.-L." Results 1 - 8 of 8
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2010, 3:50 pm by PaulKostro
” In re the Adoption of Child by W.P. and M.P., 163 N.J. 158, 169 (2000). [read post]
3 Nov 2018, 4:41 pm by ALBERTO HUAPAYA OLIVARES
” (p. 190)Este principio se complementa con otros, como lo explica Bacigalupo E. (1999) “La pretensión del Estado de aplicar las propias leyes no termina en los límites de su territorio. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 10:06 am by The Legal Blog
Justice Dalveer BhandariSupreme Court of IndiaJustice Dalveer Bhandari and Justice H.L. [read post]
24 Dec 2022, 8:10 am by Joel R. Brandes
Additionally, the Family Court properly included the children as protected persons on the order of protection, as the evidence demonstrated that doing so was “necessary to further the purposes of protection” (Family Ct Act § 842[l]; see Matter of Lengiewicz v. [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 12:04 am
 We are of the opinion that the above three decisions require to be re-considered as, in our opinion, something which cannot be done directly cannot be done indirectly. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 2:31 am by tekEditor
Bill BuxtonMicrosoft ResearchOriginal: Jan. 12, 2007Version:  March 2, 2012 Keywords / Search Terms Multi-touch, multitouch, input, interaction, touch screen, touch tablet, multi-finger input, multi-hand input, bi-manual input, two-handed input, multi-person input, interactive surfaces, soft machine, hand gesture, gesture recognition . [read post]