Search for: "In re MERCURY INTERACTIVE SECURITIES LITIGATION"
Results 1 - 12
of 12
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Sep 2007, 5:15 am
A recent backdating case,In re Mercury Interactive Corp. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 4:37 pm
In In re Mercury Interactive Corp. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 11:15 am
In In re Mercury Interactive, Litigation Release No. 20724 (SD CA Sept. 17, 2008), a settled injunctive proceeding, the complaint "alleges that the outside directors recklessly approved backdated stock option grants and reviewed and signed public filings that contained materially false and misleading disclosures about the company's stock option grants and company expenses. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 4:00 am
Securities Litigation, 618 F.3d 988 (9th Cir. 2010) and In re Bluetooth Headset Products Liability Litigation, 654 F.3d 935 (9th Cir. 2011). [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 10:40 pm
A securities class action lawsuit arising from the Mercury Interactive options backdating allegations settled for $117.5 million (about which refer here). [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 9:42 am
* In re eBay Seller Antitrust Litigation, 2010 WL 760433 (N.D. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 3:00 am
The district court found that that the plaintiffs complied with the schedule for the settlement process approved by the court, and thus, satisfied the requirements set forth in In re Mercury Interactive Corporation Securities Litigation, 618 F.3d 988, 994-95 (9th Cir. 2010). [read post]
21 Sep 2014, 11:29 am
” The goal is security: a thief can of course guess at the expiration date—the date is unlikely to be more than a few years in the future and there are only 12 months in a year; so if he guesses 60 times he’s very likely to hit the jackpot. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 9:09 am
Money = litigation. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 2:33 pm
The statute still puts state-law juries smack dab in the middle of an area that Buckman held was none of the states' business - overseeing the interactions between a federal regulatory body and the persons that it regulates. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
, US CAFC throws out jury patent infringement verdict, raises potentially invalidating prior art: Finisar v DirecTV: (Patent Prospector), (Hal Wegner), (EDTexweblog.com), (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog), (IP Law360), (Patently-O), (Patently-O), Global Global - General Further resolution needed to keep IP issues in WTO negotiations: (Intellectual Property Watch), Mobile phone manufacturers seek to control rising IP costs: (Intellectual Property Watch), Managing trade secrets for… [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
Trustee Ericka Harden was filmed on security cameras at Emba [read post]
