Search for: "In re Mandatory Electronic Filing of Appellate Briefs"
Results 1 - 20
of 38
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2008, 3:03 am
Friday, June27,2008.Per this Court's Administrative Order In Re: Mandatory Submission ofElectronic Copies of Documents, AOSC04-84, dated September 13,2004, counselare directed to transmit a copy of all briefs in an electronic format as required by theprovisions of that order.A True CopyTest:~IP,(IiI! [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 6:03 am
Per this Court's Administrative Order In Re: Mandatory Submission of Electronic Copies of Documents, AOSC04-84, dated September 13,2004, counsel are directed to transmit a copy of all briefs in an electronic fonnat as required by theprovisions of that order. [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 11:56 am
The answer brief on the merits shall be filed by July 29, 2008; and reply brief on the merits shall be filed by August 18, 2008.Oral argument, if deemed necessary, will be held September 12,2008.Per this Court's Administrative Order In Re: Mandatory Submission of Electronic Copies of Documents, AOSC04-84, dated September 13, 2004, counsel are directed to transmit a copy of all documents, including any attachments and appendices, in… [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 7:16 pm
Under this Rule, all appellate briefs, petitions, replies, appendices, motions, notices, stipulations, and responses filed with the court comply with rule 2.425. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 5:36 pm
[name withheld] did not have an attorney – he filed briefs pro se, or acting on his own behalf – and he did not argue in court. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 7:16 pm
Under this Rule, all appellate briefs, petitions, replies, appendices, motions, notices, stipulations, and responses filed with the court comply with rule 2.425. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 7:44 am
As the Advisory Committee commented, “Electronic filing has matured” and “The time has come to seize the advantages of electronic filing by making it mandatory in all districts, except for filings made by an individual not represented by an attorney. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 7:44 am
As the Advisory Committee commented, “Electronic filing has matured” and “The time has come to seize the advantages of electronic filing by making it mandatory in all districts, except for filings made by an individual not represented by an attorney. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 7:59 am
GARCIA, Appellant,v.PRESTON R. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 8:06 pm
” See In re D. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 3:03 pm
Samsung Electronics Co., 727 F.3d 1214 (Fed. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 10:45 am
[John Elwood, who purportedly contributes to this column in various capacities, filed an amicus brief in Triple Canopy urging the Court to review the issue.] [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 2:03 pm
Appellate judges know nothing about eDiscovery. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 12:14 pm
Here’s a copy of that brief. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:27 am
The Appellate Division affirmed. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 11:43 am
We’re experienced FERC attorneys with hands-on experience making dozens of these filings ourselves. ? [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 12:21 pm
Cohen then turned to the prosecution’s Appellate Exhibit (AE) 007I motion. [read post]
19 Dec 2007, 9:17 am
Comiskey filed a patent application in 1999, claiming a method for performing mandatory arbitration of one or more documents. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm
-Corpus Christi 2013, pet. filed) (orig. proceeding). [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 10:02 am
” He got the hint and filed an amicus brief expressing the views of the United States. [read post]
