Search for: "In re Marilyn H.(1993)"
Results 1 - 5
of 5
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2012, 9:00 am
So important is this goal of family maintenance and reunification that the California Supreme Court has noted, "up until the time the section 366.26(termination of parental rights) hearing is set, the parent's interest in reunification is given precedence over the child's need for stability and permanency" [ In re Marilyn H. (1993) 5 Cal. 4th 295, 310, 19 Cal. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 6:23 pm
†â€" In re Marilyn H. (1993) 5 Cal.4th 295, 310, 851 P.2d 826; 19 Cal. [read post]
21 Feb 2006, 10:01 pm
In re Steingbrecher, 110 B.R. 155 (Bankr. [read post]
22 May 2017, 12:00 pm
Honorable Peter H. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 9:52 am
We lawyers have to keep such secrets about people as part of our jobs, but we're used to it, and we're handsomely compensated for it. [read post]
