Search for: "In re Marks"
Results 81 - 100
of 29,668
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jul 2023, 4:04 am
This morning, Res Ipsa passed the 73,000,000 mark in views on the blog. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 3:39 am
Today, Res Ipsa passed the 70,000,000 mark in views on the blog. [read post]
31 Mar 2022, 4:22 am
Res Ipsa yesterday passed the 57,000,000 mark in views on the blog. [read post]
16 Jul 2022, 10:33 am
Today, Res Ipsa passed the 60,000,000 mark in views on the blog. [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 3:00 am
This morning, Res Ipsa passed the 64,000,000 mark in views on the blog. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 8:43 am
(BTW, we're going to refer to trademarks and service marks interchangeably). [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 8:50 pm
MARK STEYN held not guilty of hate speech. [read post]
19 Sep 2007, 12:23 pm
For starters, a Happy and Healthy New Year to anyone celebrating it (what the heck, even if you're not . . .). [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 3:23 am
In re Crane USA, Inc., Serial No. 86172232 (August 7, 2015) [not precedential].As we know, product configuration trade dress is registrable only upon proof of acquired distinctiveness. [read post]
17 Jul 2016, 10:00 pm
Post By Blog Staff In In re Hodgdon Powder Company, Inc., the TTAB overturned a prior refusal to register a color mark for gunpowder. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 2:38 pm
See In re Dixie Rests. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 1:59 pm
In practical terms, the change should yield benefits, e.g. saving money on the fee for re-issuing a paper trade mark registration certificate (around EUR 60 each), reducing the risk of losing certificates when forwarding them from agents to clients, and (obviously) preventing a recurrence of the paper shortage (!). [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 9:48 am
In re BP Lubricants USA Inc. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 5:17 am
R. 32.1(e), the CAFC has re-designated as precedential its opinion in In re GO & Associates, LLC, Appeal No. 2022-1961 (Fed. [read post]
14 Oct 2023, 4:41 pm
("Winchester") from the decision of Mark Bryant on behalf of the Registrar of Trade Marks in Re COLEBURN trade mark D & M Winchester Ltd, v [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 2:52 pm
The purpose of a certification mark is to certify certain goods' material, mode of manufacture or quality, and if the nature of the goods is such that they are used and re-used by a large number of entities, it seems reasonable that a certification mark must be able to perform its function even after first sale. [read post]
7 Nov 2006, 5:40 am
MARK BLUMENTHAL WRITES on what you should know about exit polls. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 9:00 pm
" In re Deutsche Telekom AG, Serial No. 78492246 (March 7, 2007) [not precedential].The Examining Attorney argued that Applicant "has simply taken registrant's nearly identical mark, NEWSEXPRESS, and added its T-Mobile house mark to it. [read post]
6 May 2011, 5:15 pm
MARK STEYN: “We’re Culturally Sensitive And Tote Really Big Guns. [read post]
10 Jan 2010, 12:01 am
MARK STEYN: Obama Can't Say Who We're At War With. [read post]
