Search for: "In re Marriage of Brown" Results 1 - 20 of 304
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2020, 12:52 pm by Gregory Forman
In this case, Tommie Rae Brown attempted to argue that, because her marriage prior to James Brown was actually void as bigamous, and not merely voidable, when that prior marriage was annulled her marriage to James Brown became valid. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:18 pm by Walter Olson
Go for clarity rather than depth of feeling, advises Paul Horwitz [PrawfsBlawg] Re: AMK’s revival of substantive due process, warns John McGinnis, libertarians should be careful what they wish for [Law and Liberty] Tags: judges, same-sex marriage, Supreme CourtWhat Anthony Kennedy could have learned from Brown v. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 12:25 pm by guestblogger
  Susan Brown, a university sociology professor, said, “What we’re seeing with marriage trends today mirrors what’s happening in our broader economy, where we’re seeing diverging fortunes for those at the upper and lower end of the spectrum, with rising inequality. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 10:49 am
" He said he believes that legal experts who think his position has no chance haven't read the high court's ruling in In re Marriage Cases, 43 Cal.4th 757. [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 2:32 am
He believes that Proposition 8 lacks such a justification as determined by the Supreme Court in the In re Marriage Cases and, therefore, deprives persons of basic liberty guaranteed" by the state Constitution. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 10:00 am by azatty
’ https://t.co/nVWlWlYqVg pic.twitter.com/SFyvRqH3AH — DeNeen Brown (@DeNeenLBrown) August 19, 2016 When you’re done reading the Post piece, be sure to read our book review of Showdown: Thurgood Marshall and the Supreme Court Nomination That Changed America, by Wil Haygood. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 2:28 pm by Howard Friedman
Justice Brown in a concurring opinion joined by Justice Devine (full text) argued that the trial court procedurally should not have used the device of a temporary restraining order to allow the same-sex marriage to go forward, after which plaintiffs dismissed their lawsuit. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 6:30 am
We're there some ambiguous interludes that were maybe marriage maybe not marriage? [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 8:52 am by Timothy P. Flynn, Esq.
The California Supreme Court squashed the practice in about 30-days, voiding all the marriage licenses issued as a result of Gavin's project.In a May 2008 change of course, the California Supreme Court decided (4-3) the case known as In Re Marriage Cases, holding that any California laws, "that treat persons differently because of their sexual orientation should be subjected to strict scrutiny..."   [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 9:03 am by Timothy P. Flynn
The California Supreme Court squashed the practice in about 30-days, voiding all the marriage licenses issued as a result of Gavin's project.In a May 2008 change of course, the California Supreme Court decided (4-3) the case known as In Re Marriage Cases, holding that any California laws, "that treat persons differently because of their sexual orientation should be subjected to strict scrutiny..."   [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 10:45 am by Tammy Binford
Cockrum, an attorney with Frost Brown Todd LLC in Louisville, Kentucky, said that although the full 6th Circuit might review the ruling, the current split among the circuits may give the Supreme Court justices a ruling they’re eager to review. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 3:13 pm by Mark Walsh
Eastman, the chairman of the board of the National Organization for Marriage, a group in favor of traditional marriage, is in the Courtroom, we’re told. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 2:55 pm
"Let's say you're a professional blogger (so you need to buy a computer), or a driver for UPS (so you need to buy a brown truck). [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 12:00 am by Suzana Popovic-Montag
One hundred years hence, we see from cases such as Goodwin and Brown Estate that the decision in Muirhead Estate, Re, is still good law – though the distinction of second marriages of men and women is in all likelihood obsolete. [read post]