Search for: "In re Marriage of Brown"
Results 1 - 20
of 430
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Dec 2010, 8:35 am
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Unpublished Opinion in the following matter: DA 10-0050, 2010 MT 265N, IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF: MAGGIE RAE BROWN, Petitioner and Appellee, and RICHE ALLEN HOLLAND, Respondent and Appellant. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 12:52 pm
In this case, Tommie Rae Brown attempted to argue that, because her marriage prior to James Brown was actually void as bigamous, and not merely voidable, when that prior marriage was annulled her marriage to James Brown became valid. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:18 pm
Go for clarity rather than depth of feeling, advises Paul Horwitz [PrawfsBlawg] Re: AMK’s revival of substantive due process, warns John McGinnis, libertarians should be careful what they wish for [Law and Liberty] Tags: judges, same-sex marriage, Supreme CourtWhat Anthony Kennedy could have learned from Brown v. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 7:19 am
Brown case shows. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 10:49 am
" He said he believes that legal experts who think his position has no chance haven't read the high court's ruling in In re Marriage Cases, 43 Cal.4th 757. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 9:40 pm
Starr and Brown parted company, however, on the question whether Prop 8 would invalidate same-sex marriages performed prior to its enactment. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 12:17 pm
I focus here on plural marriage. [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 2:32 am
He believes that Proposition 8 lacks such a justification as determined by the Supreme Court in the In re Marriage Cases and, therefore, deprives persons of basic liberty guaranteed" by the state Constitution. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 1:28 pm
Supporters of Proposition 8, which would amend the California Constitution to ban same-sex marriage and overturn the California Supreme Court’s decision in In re Marriage Cases, have filed suit against Attorney General Jerry Brown. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 10:00 am
’ https://t.co/nVWlWlYqVg pic.twitter.com/SFyvRqH3AH — DeNeen Brown (@DeNeenLBrown) August 19, 2016 When you’re done reading the Post piece, be sure to read our book review of Showdown: Thurgood Marshall and the Supreme Court Nomination That Changed America, by Wil Haygood. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 9:49 am
"Justice is on our side and we're about to reclaim it. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 4:02 pm
JEFFREY BROWN: All right, we're definitely going to look at that next week. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 2:28 pm
Justice Brown in a concurring opinion joined by Justice Devine (full text) argued that the trial court procedurally should not have used the device of a temporary restraining order to allow the same-sex marriage to go forward, after which plaintiffs dismissed their lawsuit. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 6:30 am
We're there some ambiguous interludes that were maybe marriage maybe not marriage? [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 6:00 am
We’re not bigots. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 4:30 pm
Kody Brown & his 4 Sister WivesBy: Timothy P. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 10:45 am
Cockrum, an attorney with Frost Brown Todd LLC in Louisville, Kentucky, said that although the full 6th Circuit might review the ruling, the current split among the circuits may give the Supreme Court justices a ruling they’re eager to review. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 3:13 pm
Eastman, the chairman of the board of the National Organization for Marriage, a group in favor of traditional marriage, is in the Courtroom, we’re told. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 9:03 am
The California Supreme Court squashed the practice in about 30-days, voiding all the marriage licenses issued as a result of Gavin's project.In a May 2008 change of course, the California Supreme Court decided (4-3) the case known as In Re Marriage Cases, holding that any California laws, "that treat persons differently because of their sexual orientation should be subjected to strict scrutiny... [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 8:52 am
The California Supreme Court squashed the practice in about 30-days, voiding all the marriage licenses issued as a result of Gavin's project.In a May 2008 change of course, the California Supreme Court decided (4-3) the case known as In Re Marriage Cases, holding that any California laws, "that treat persons differently because of their sexual orientation should be subjected to strict scrutiny... [read post]
