Search for: "In re Marriage of Cross (2001)" Results 21 - 40 of 65
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2018, 4:40 am by Jan von Hein
It is then shown that the formal requirements for marriage contracts in Article 25 refer to the lex causae which may cause difficulty. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 9:06 am by Martin George
NO. 44/2001 applicable in respect of an action for a negative declaration in tort matters? [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 4:51 am by Patti Spencer
First: NEVER make changes to a will by inserting, crossing out, or doing anything to alter the will. [read post]
8 May 2015, 9:58 am by MBettman
Case Background In April 2001, Appellant James Kuhn bought an undeveloped tract of land in Guernsey County for $30,000. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 6:05 am by Joel R. Brandes
The wife cross-moved to replead the claim under DRL §  170(7) to include the specific allegation that the marriage was irretrievably broken for a period of greater than six months. [read post]
11 Apr 2020, 9:48 am by Dan Harris
Andrew Sullivan’s 1989 New Republic article convinced me to favor gay marriage. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 10:58 am by Tia Sewell
It alleges a host of crimes including murder, torture, unlawful imprisonment and forced marriages. [read post]
3 May 2012, 4:58 pm by Ronda Muir
  This is basically our associate and we’re the partner. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 5:56 pm
Theodore Rex by Edmund Morris (2001) [cd, unabridged] 43. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 12:38 pm
Theodore Rex by Edmund Morris (2001) [cd, unabridged] 43. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 1:54 am by Gilles Cuniberti
For these reasons, the current article argues that registered relationships with cross-border effects should be recognised as such outside their state of origin. [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 7:00 am by Kelly Goles
But the clear frontrunner for me is Elle Woods from the 2001 film Legally Blonde. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 2:47 am by Jan von Hein
However, the European Court of Justice extends the effects of res judicata to prejudicial questions of the validity of a choice-of-forum clause, in this respect it approves a European conception of substantive res judicata (ECJ, 15.11.2012 – Case C 456/11 – Gothaer Allgemeine Versicherung AG ./. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 11:25 am by Veronika Gaertner
This holding might have been driven by the court’s wish not to apply the traditional rule in Art. 5(1) lit. a Brussels I 2001 (Art. 7(1) lit. a Brussels I 2012), according to which the place of performance must be determined with reference to the primary obligation in question. [read post]