Search for: "In re Marriage of Cross (2001)" Results 21 - 37 of 37
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2013, 1:54 am by Gilles Cuniberti
For these reasons, the current article argues that registered relationships with cross-border effects should be recognised as such outside their state of origin. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 2:47 am by Jan von Hein
However, the European Court of Justice extends the effects of res judicata to prejudicial questions of the validity of a choice-of-forum clause, in this respect it approves a European conception of substantive res judicata (ECJ, 15.11.2012 – Case C 456/11 – Gothaer Allgemeine Versicherung AG ./. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 11:25 am by Veronika Gaertner
This holding might have been driven by the court’s wish not to apply the traditional rule in Art. 5(1) lit. a Brussels I 2001 (Art. 7(1) lit. a Brussels I 2012), according to which the place of performance must be determined with reference to the primary obligation in question. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 12:16 pm by Dan Harris
 A few of the bridges crossing pretty wide rivers are actually scary as hell. [read post]
11 Jul 2009, 2:19 am
The arguments put forward by the Higher Regional Court of Munich would also rule out any cross border enforcement of German contempt fines according to the rules of the Regulation (EC) No. 44/2001. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 1:53 pm by Stephen Page
Almost every day he would come home and re-arrange them in a way he felt they should be. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 8:57 am
The Washington Post, already quite cross with this administration for other reasons, put forward a "perspective" chiding the United States for lecturing Europeans on their own affairs and then noting: "The third and most disturbing takeaway was the number of times panelists talked about the need to cope with the United States and China, as if there were no difference between the two countries in Europe’s eyes" (Europeans are quite aware of what… [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
”[71] Justice Arbour noted that, in explaining the standard to a jury, it might be preferable to re-word the standard of causation using positive terms, for example, a phrase such as a “‘significant contributing cause’ rather than using expressions phrased in the negative such as ‘not a trivial cause’ or ‘not insignificant’. [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 3:13 pm
The queen of New York blawgers told me that when she ran this race on the first Sunday in November 2001 the ground was still burning. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 11:26 am by Joel R. Brandes
Among those belongings were legal documents, including the children's birth certificates and the parties' marriage certificate. . [read post]
19 May 2010, 4:49 am by Stephen Page
Foreign marriages are only recognised if they meet this definition. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 6:19 am by Joel R. Brandes
The parties' two older sons re-enrolled in their private school for the 2010 school year. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 12:12 pm by fvanloon
So, frustratingly slowly – but surely – we’re getting piece after piece of the Obamagate puzzle. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 7:53 am by Joel R. Brandes
At the time of trial, the mother, who was remarried, cared for her younger child from her second marriage, full time. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
An intelligence report dated 26th September 1999 damningly states: While in the company of Rees, ‘Maz’ was with a plain clothes officer aged about 45 – officer was selling a story to Maz about inter-race marriage and the payment in dowry in the form of livestock The ‘Rees’ mentioned in the intelligence report is private investigator Jonathan Rees from Southern Investigations. [read post]
14 Dec 2013, 12:28 pm by 74.christopher@gmail.com
The parties’ marriage and the births of their children……………………………………………………………10 2. [read post]