Search for: "In re Marriage of Davis"
Results 1 - 20
of 181
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2018, 4:05 am
Davis garnered national attention in 2015 by her adamant refusal to sign marriage licenses for same-sex couples. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 8:41 am
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Unpublished Opinion in the following matter: DA 11-0567, 2012 MT 136N, IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF: DAVIE LIN LLOYD, Petitioner and Appellant, and BRETT CAMARON LLOYD, Respondent and Appellee. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 7:12 am
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 10-0494, 2011 MT 133, IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF: DAVIE LIN LLOYD, Petitioner and Appellant, and BRETT CAMARON LLOYD, Respondent and Appellee. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 2:15 pm
Davis is entitled to her religious beliefs on same-sex marriage, but she can’t shirk her official duties because of them. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 2:33 pm
What if you're living in the den? [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 4:10 am
In In re Marriage of Melanie Davis and Angela Summers, (IN App., Dec. 20, 2013), the Indiana Court of Appeals held that a marriage between a man and a woman that is valid when entered does not become void when one of the spouses is diagnosed with gender dysphoria and has his or her birth certificate amended to reflect a change in gender. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 12:57 pm
The details of another couple's marriage are often unknown outside of that marriage:"The parties were married on June 12, 1993. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 6:30 pm
Earlier this month, the judge issued a preliminary order requiring her to issue those couples a license when they re-apply. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 3:50 pm
And from Michelle Meyer, professional obligations of lawyers counseling clients re: contempt. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 5:30 am
The trial judge found that it was unlikely that the county would have intended to throw out Davy Crockett's marriage license and so it belonged to the county. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 7:04 am
(c) It is the intent of the Legislature in enacting this section to abrogate the decisions in In re Marriage of Davis (2015) 61 Cal.4th 846 and In re Marriage of Norviel (2002) 102 Cal.App.4th 1152. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 5:57 pm
If you're keeping track, that means she's younger than two of his four daughters (whose ages range from 23 to 43). [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 6:10 am
Davis posted some musings about the same-sex marriage situation in California on the HuffingtonPost.com blog. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 8:45 am
The First District Court of Appeal sustained a trial court's holding in In re Marriage of Davis which stands for the proposition that it is not necessary for spouses to maintain two separate residences in order to be "separated" for the purposes of determining date of separation. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 6:57 am
But it’s a whole lot easier if you’re married. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 5:32 pm
Morgan Watkins of The Courier Journal of Louisville, Kentucky reports that “US Supreme Court justices criticize same-sex marriage ruling, call Kim Davis a ‘victim. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 12:00 am
Davis Download hi-res image. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
We are not talking here just about the scope of Judge Walker’s injunctive remedy against State officials, but whether the judgment in favor of the plaintiffs itself has to be erased and re-sought (in a different form) by the plaintiffs. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 8:40 am
Such a remedy—the complete voiding of a discriminatory marriage regime—was, in fact, discussed by both the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Council in its 2003 Goodridge opinion (where that remedy option was summarily dismissed) and the California Supreme Court in its 2008 decision, In re Marriage Cases, about the ‘separate but equal’ domestic partnership/marriage scheme then present in California. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 6:38 pm
Marriage of Davis (7/20/15) [Click to Read] In what is possibly its most shocking family law decision in years, the California Supreme Court just radically and unanimously re-arranged the fault lines that frame the borders dividing what judges may consider to be community and separate property in our State. [read post]
