Search for: "In re Marriage of Flaherty" Results 1 - 10 of 10
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2020, 3:31 pm
” (In re Marriage of Flaherty (1982) 31 Cal.3d 637, 650-651.) [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 9:11 am
Sortino of the Los Angeles Superior Court, will be sitting Pro-Tem in Division Eight until May 31, 2017.Today's DJ features Gary Watt on Frivolous Appeals, in which he discusses the classic In re Marriage of Flaherty (1982) 31 Cal.3d 637, and concludes: It's complete lack of objective merit that makes an appeal frivolous. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 8:33 am
 Next, in an anti-SLAPP appeal here, sanctions are not imposed, but could have been:In view of the absence of a request for sanctions by PAAMCO and the general principles that sanctions for frivolous appeals “should be used most sparingly to deter only the most egregious conduct” (In re Marriage of Flaherty (1982) 31 Cal.3d 637, 651), and that “[c]ounsel and their clients have a right to present issues that are arguably correct, even if it is… [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 12:39 pm
(Wilson, supra, 28 Cal.4th at p. 817; accord, Sheldon Appel, at p. 885; In re Marriage of Flaherty (1982) 31 Cal.3d 637, 650; see also Zamos, supra, 32 Cal.4th at p. 970.). [read post]
28 May 2012, 1:41 pm by Gary A. Watt
  (In re Marriage of Flaherty (1982) 31 Cal.3d 637, 649-650.) [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 11:13 am by Roshonda Scipio
Employment Law(RES) KF3464 .F738 2010Employment discrimination / Joel Wm. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 11:53 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
Most everyday citizens won’t encounter the Commonwealth Court unless they’re suing the government or if they’re appealing a workers’ compensation or unemployment decision. [read post]
30 May 2008, 9:09 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]