Search for: "In re Marriage of Siegel" Results 1 - 20 of 21
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Aug 2015, 3:04 pm
When a complaint seeks only X, the trial court isn't empowered to give the plaintiff Y.So, for example, when a complaint seeks only that the ex-husband produce evidence that he has purchased the life insurance required by a marital dissolution agreement, and at the hearing, the ex-husband provides proof of insurance, the trial court can't order that the ex-husband establish and fund a $126,910 trust. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 8:56 am
*Neil Siegel analyzes the cert denials as a form of persuading rather than coercing lower courts to strike down same-sex marriage bans, a “passive virtue” (Alexander Bickel’s phrase) that the Court adopts in times of constitutional transition. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 11:41 am by Steven Calabresi
[Earlier contributions to this symposium came from: John Neiman, Dale Carpenter, Robin Wilson, Bill Eskridge,  Scott Michelman, Neil Siegel, and Suzanne Goldberg.] [read post]
28 Feb 2015, 11:05 am by Neil Siegel
” In her Foreword in the Harvard Law Review, Reva Siegel (no relation) also has emphasized the equality-infused portions of Kennedy’s opinion. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 5:54 am by Amy Howe
Hodges, in which the Court struck down state bans on same-sex marriage and the recognition thereof, continues. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
[We're moving this post up, as the deadline of December 10, 2016 is fast approaching!] [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 12:08 pm by Scott Bomboy
“We’re not going to dispute that the government has, under certain circumstances, the right to issue a quarantine,” he said. [read post]
1 May 2009, 12:05 pm
And it's his second marriage, natch. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 6:58 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Reva Siegel, whose scholarship and comments significantly influenced these views of mine. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 4:30 am
They're the modern analogues of cannons (which the government would have supplied) rather than pistols and muskets (which militia members would have brought with them to muster). [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 12:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Thomas University ·         Charlie Wing and the Alberta Liquor Control Board: Anti-Chinese Racism and the Liquor Laws in Post-Prohibition Alberta—Sarah Hamill, School of Law, Trinity College Dublin ·         Law, Liberalism, and the Red Scare—Laura Weinrib, University of Chicago ·         Policing Vice, 1776-1876—David Thacher, University of… [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 1:09 pm by Dan Ernst
Student Presenters: Jonathon Booth, Harvard University (jonathonbooth@g.harvard.edu)The Birth of Policing in Post-Emancipation JamaicaLauren Feldman, Johns Hopkins University (Lauren.feldman@jhu.edu)Constructing Legal Matrimony and the State in New York and the United States: Debating New York’s Marriage Act of 1827 and its EffectsJamie Grischkan, Boston University (jgrisch@bu.edu)Banking, Law, and American Liberalism: The Rise and Regulation of Bank Holding Companies in the Twentieth… [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
[We're moving this up, because we've received an updated version of the program. [read post]
15 May 2019, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
The surplus of constitutional meaning means that new claims can enter the center from the margins (think of marriage equality, though also of gun rights). [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 7:23 am by Ronald Collins
The following is a series of questions posed by Ronald Collins on the occasion of the publication of The Burger Court & the Rise of the Judicial Right (Simon & Schuster, 2016, pp. 450), by Michael J. [read post]