Search for: "In re Marriage of Smith (1990)" Results 1 - 20 of 35
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Aug 2011, 7:08 am by Thomas C. Berg - Guest
Smith (1990), and the California Supreme Court, under the state constitution, have held that courts should not order an accommodation from “laws of general applicability” that are formally neutral toward religion.  [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 9:33 pm by Helene L Taylor
California law and cases on point include, among others: California Family Code section 2641 California Family Code section 2627 California Family Code section4320(b) and (d) In re Marriage of Lucas (1980) 27 C3d 808In re Marriage of Watt (1989) 214 CA3d 340In re Marriage of Rocha (1998) 68 CA4th 514Marriage of Graham (2003) 109 CA4th 1321Marriage of Ostler & Smith (1990) 223 CA3d 33 If education costs and/or student loan… [read post]
17 May 2017, 7:50 am by Goldberg Jones
Roughly 70% of marriages that took place in the 1990s made it to their 15th anniversaries. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 7:12 am by Joel R. Brandes
The parties were married in Massachusetts on March 25, 1990 and had three unemancipated children of the marriage. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 11:22 am by Joel R. Brandes
The parties were married in Massachusetts on March 25, 1990 and had three unemancipated children of the marriage. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 11:19 am by Lyle Denniston
” From the day in 1990 that the Court announced that major new constitutional decision re-interpreting the long-running history of church-state conflict, the Smith ruling has never been free of harsh criticism, and from within the Court, too. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 5:02 am by Eugene Volokh
So, if you're right about that, why should we even entertain the question whether to overrule Smith? [read post]
26 May 2020, 10:29 am by Eugene Volokh
Rev. 1409, 1415 (1990) [("Jefferson's understanding of the scope and rationale of free exercise rights, however, was more limited even than Locke's. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 8:00 am by Guest Blogger
They have a defibrillator on hand at the ball field, and one of our guys, Earl Smith, is a doctor. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 12:56 pm
The most theatrical blow that the island has taken in recent times is, of course, the one that struck us on December 17, 2014: the re-establishing of ties between the Cuban and American governments. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 7:58 am by brown
”A denomination that had once proudly carried the banner for freedom of conscience was now demanding school prayer amendments, pressing for tax support of sectarian schools, bashing LGBT rights, advocating creationism in public schools, demanding that wives submit to their husbands and, most recently, insisting that its theological view of marriage be the law of the land for all.In the mid-1990s, when the far right cooked up a monstrosity called the “religious freedom… [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 5:29 pm by Richard A. Epstein
Smith is desperately wrong because it does not understand the need for making workable accommodations between general public laws and religious liberties. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 7:04 am by John Elwood
Smith, the decision that prompted Congress to enact the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993. [read post]
10 May 2020, 8:01 am by Russell Knight
“[T]he court may order either or both parents owing a duty of support to a child of the marriage or civil union to pay an amount reasonable and necessary for support. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 6:39 am
Smith (1990), which held that the Free Exercise Clause generally did not require religious exemptions from generally applicable laws (though it left room for many statute-by-statute exemptions). [read post]