Search for: "In re McGee" Results 61 - 80 of 194
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jan 2016, 7:41 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Craftily Teacher’s Semi-Racy Facebook Photo Doesn’t Justify Firing – In re Laraine Cook Do Employers Really Tread a Minefield When Firing Employees for Facebook Gaffes? [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 2:59 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
They're not very good at policing their own, Mark Bennett's on-point blog screeds notwithstanding. [read post]
25 Oct 2015, 9:11 am by Venkat Balasubramani
McGee Police Officers Lean on School to Fire Social Worker for Facebook Post–and May Have Violated First Amendment Police Officer’s Facebook Venting Isn’t Protected By The First Amendment–Gresham v. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 7:22 pm by Bill Marler
E. coli O157:H7 was identified for the first time at the CDC in 1975, but it was not until seven years later, in 1982, that E. coli O157:H7 was conclusively determined to be a cause of enteric disease. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 8:02 am by Venkat Balasubramani
” The Board of Trustees met the next month and the Chancellor re-affirmed that she would not be recommending Dr. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 2:00 pm by James
At the very least, the driver is going to have some hard questions to answer, because a lot of people here got hurt, and they’re going to want to know why. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 5:00 am
  One of our readers sent us that brief (a publicly filed document) and asked us to comment.So we will, but we’re not identifying either the case or the plaintiff’s lawyer – if you’re reading, you know who you are.To us, the plaintiff’s proposition is, in one word, absurd. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 6:00 am by Bridget Crawford
Below the fold is Version 3.1 of the census of law prof Twitter users. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 7:14 am by Venkat Balasubramani
McGee, where a social worker’s social media rant allegedly “permanently compromised” her future credibility as a witness in court. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:12 am
  We’re not entirely sure, but to some extent not discussing damages means not discussing losing. [read post]
27 Sep 2014, 11:28 am by Venkat Balasubramani
[From an employee's perspective, if you're going to complain, don't do it about your customers; kvetch about your boss instead?] [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 5:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
McGee ("Although this undermines [defendant's] argument, a finding that AA requires confidentiality is not necessary to our holding. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm by Schachtman
ITERATIVE DISJUNCTIVE SYLLOGISM Basic propositional logic teaches that the disjunctive syllogism (modus tollendo ponens) is a valid argument, in which one of its premises is a disjunction (P v Q), and the other premise is the negation of one of the disjuncts: P v Q ~P­­­_____ ∴ Q See Irving Copi & Carl Cohen Introduction to Logic at 362 (2005). [read post]