Search for: "In re Michael C."
Results 1 - 20
of 2,218
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2025, 6:54 am
February 16, 2025 Appellate Divison, First Department Appellate Divison remanded for a new dispositional hearing under the authority of Matter of Michael B., based upon the advice of the child's attorney. [read post]
12 Mar 2025, 11:16 am
That requires application of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 65( c) cover the full amount of potential injury to the state: (c) SECURITY. [read post]
9 Mar 2025, 8:00 am
Race-conscious grantmaking and programming – historically not a 501(c)(3) exemption issue (i.e., they have been consistent with furthering charitable purposes) – Treasury Regulations define what constitutes a charitable purposes to include efforts to eliminate prejudice and discrimination and defend human and civil rights secured by law General Rule: a 501(c)(3) organization cannot be operated for illegal purposes or purposes contrary to public policy (what is… [read post]
1 Mar 2025, 4:09 pm
It was at this time that O’Connor re-entered the paid work force to contribute to the family’s expenses. [read post]
26 Feb 2025, 4:40 am
Lolita C. [read post]
25 Feb 2025, 12:16 am
It finds allegations (A), (C), (D), (E), (G), (I) and (K) not proved. (7 December 2022). [read post]
21 Feb 2025, 11:58 am
Gadola and Judges Thomas C. [read post]
16 Feb 2025, 9:01 pm
Even more ominously, Trump increasingly regards his own will as law, regardless of how many statutes or constitutional provisions he violates.Follow @dorfonlaw Michael C. [read post]
14 Feb 2025, 3:00 am
Judge to Trump-Terminated Ethics Watchdog: You’re un-fired MSN – Josh Gerstein (Politico) | Published: 2/10/2025 A federal judge reined in President Trump’s firing spree, ruling a federal ethics watchdog can return to his job for at least a few days while the judge receives more detailed legal arguments about the case. [read post]
10 Feb 2025, 9:03 am
In a judgment given by Michael Tappin KC sitting as a Deputy High Court judge, the word mark was held invalid for most of its goods and services where the judge felt consumers would consider the mark to indicate short-form audiovisual content and other marks were revoked for non-use for some goods and services. [read post]
7 Feb 2025, 8:46 am
Froeb, Dan O’Brien, and Michael G. [read post]
1 Feb 2025, 6:15 am
" ―Glenn C. [read post]
31 Jan 2025, 1:12 am
Links to all the published determinations &c are here. [read post]
28 Jan 2025, 11:33 am
(c) Conduct arising from posting the message would cause a reasonable person to suffer emotional distress and to feel terrorized, frightened, intimidated, threatened, harassed, or molested. [read post]
21 Jan 2025, 2:17 am
Michael P. [read post]
17 Jan 2025, 3:53 am
In re Lofty Water LLC, Serial No. 97043120 (January 7, 2025) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Christopher C. [read post]
10 Jan 2025, 11:31 am
Ho, Michael E. [read post]
7 Jan 2025, 9:01 pm
Such a remarkable coincidence can only be explained by the hypothesis that the Roberts Court supermajority believes—or pretends—that the Constitution is, by their lights, perfect.With respect to that view and others, the Justices would be well served by the kind of skepticism, honesty, and integrity that characterized the scholarship of Henry Monaghan.Follow @dorfonlaw Michael C. [read post]
6 Jan 2025, 2:55 am
Bei Verantwortlichen im Ausland zeigte der EDÖB zuletzt allerdings keinen Biss.Möglich wäre in der Schweiz auch ein Strafverfahren gegen einzelne verantwortliche Personen aufgrund der Verletzung der Sorgfaltspflichten, nämlich weil die Mindestanforderungen an die Datensicherheit nicht eingehalten wurden (Art. 61 lit. c DSG).Dabei ist umstritten, ob die Formulierung dieser Mindestanforderungen in der Datenschutzverordnung (DSV) für ein Strafverfahren… [read post]
27 Dec 2024, 6:07 am
"] In re Monogram Health, Inc., Serial No. 97412872 (December 23, 2024) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Michael B. [read post]
